“To begin with, what an amazing comet that must have been from which
these five, and we know not how many more, were formed by
disaggregative processes—probably by the divellent action of
repulsive forces exerted by the sun! Those who remember the comets
of 1843 and 1882 as they appeared when at their full splendor will
be able to imagine how noble an appearance a comet would present
which was formed of these combined together in one. But the comet of
1880 was described by all who saw it in the southern hemisphere as
most remarkable in appearance, despite the faintness of its head.
The great southern comet of the present year (1887) was a striking
object in the skies, though it showed the same weakness about the
head. That of 1668 was probably as remarkable in appearance as even
the comet of 1882. A comet formed by combining all these together
would certainly surpass in magnificence all the comets ever observed
by astronomers.
“And then, what enormous periods of time must have been required to
distribute the fragments of a single comet so widely that one would
be found returning to its perihelion more than two centuries after
another! When I spoke of one member of the Biela group being in
aphelion, when another would be in perihelion, I was speaking of a
difference of only three and one-third years in time; and even that
would require thousands of years. But the scattered cometic bodies
which returned to the sun’s neighborhood in 1668 and 1887 speak
probably of millions of years which have passed since first this
comet was formed. It would be a matter of curious inquiry to
determine what may have been the condition of our sun, what even his
volume, at that remote period in history.”
In view of our present knowledge of the status of the sun as a
comparative dwarf in the stellar system, may it not have been a giant
star at that remote period of its existence above referred to, rivaling
in volume the giant star Betelgeuse with its diameter exceeding two
hundred million miles.[13] At that period of the evolution of the sun,
how terrific must have been the force of the upheavals which rent its
surface, flinging forth cometic material with incalculable speed, to
distances far exceeding any known in connection with the comets with
which we are familiar.
Regarding the solar origin of comets, Dr. A. C. D. Crommelin writes as
follows in _Splendour of the Heavens_, page 407:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account