The romance of insect life : $b Interesting descriptions of the strange and curious in the insect worldSelous, Edmund
Science
The romance of insect life : $b Interesting descriptions of the strange and curious in the insect world
Selous, Edmund
Insects
wonderful that, after a time, the primitive individualistic tendency
should again assert itself. But when the fugitive is overtaken, it
assists the other to roll the ball back, and the end of it all is a meal
shared peacefully between the two, in one common apartment. If we
suppose that the instinct, or capacity, of working together for some
common end has had any beginning, surely we might expect to find it in
some such state of affairs as this. The result of primitive conceptions
is that two Scarabæi are often obliged to roll one ball between them,
and if there be any advantage in this arrangement, natural selection
will no doubt do the rest. That it has already begun to do it is, I
think, very probable; but Fabre was not an evolutionist.
-----
Footnote 70:
The Malay Archipelago.
Footnote 71:
Darwin, The Descent of Man, p. 300.
Footnote 72:
The Malay Archipelago.
Footnote 73:
Souvenirs Entomologiques.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHAPTER XVII
Do ants sow and reap?—Rival observers—The Texan _v._
Macaulay’s schoolboy—More evidence wanted—How ants cross
rivers—Tubular bridges—Ant armies—A world in flight—Living
nests—Ants and plants—Mutual dependence—Nests in thorns and
tubers—Ant honey-pots—Business humanity—Burial customs—A
strange observation—Two views of ants.
MUSHROOM-GROWING, especially if the ants plant the mushrooms in the way
stated by Mr. Tanner, is just as extraordinary, I think, as their habit
of planting a field with ant-rice and reaping it at the proper time
would be, did they really practise it. Up to a little while ago it
certainly seemed as though they did, for there was Dr. Lincecum’s
definite statement based upon twelve years’ observation, and this, if
not confirmed by Mr. McCook, was, at any rate, not contradicted by him.
On the contrary, McCook mentioned a good many facts pointing in the
direction of Lincecum’s assertion, and though he did not consider them
decisive, he could see no reason why the ants should not act in this
way, as indeed there is none: so that as he had only stayed a few months
where Lincecum had lived for twelve years, he seemed like a weaker
witness supporting, according to his opportunities of observation, a
much stronger one. Now, however, comes another witness, whose
opportunities have also been great, and in a somewhat heavy-handed way,
in a spirit of myth-slaying and irrelevant reference to supposed
schoolboy knowledge, hardly required in face of all that ants are known
to do, denies the whole thing.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account