The Romance of Modern Geology: Describing in simple but exact language the making of the earth with some account of prehistoric animal lifeGrew, Edwin Sharpe
Science
The Romance of Modern Geology: Describing in simple but exact language the making of the earth with some account of prehistoric animal life
Grew, Edwin Sharpe
Geology; Paleontology
The trilobites, to turn to animal life, all but disappeared,
though one elegant example remained; the corals were changing; and
the lamp-shells were dropping out. There were a few new species
of fishes, but none of any great strength or capacity, and all
preserving still the tail which is part of the backbone. There was an
all-round impoverishment of life--so great, indeed, that the early
geologists used to believe that a complete destruction of all life
followed this, the closing stage of the Palæozoic era, and that a
re-creation followed. They would have been confirmed in this belief
had they but known that intense cold and glaciation were setting
in where the tropics were situated and that the dryness of vast
deserts was sweeping away life elsewhere. But we now know that life
was not entirely lost; that many species survived, and that others,
altering to suit altering conditions, became stronger in the process.
Nevertheless, life was greatly impoverished. A census made a few
years ago gave the known animal species of the Carboniferous period
as 10,000, while those of the Permian period were only 300, or three
per cent. Possibly the percentage was larger than that, but still it
was small.
But if the Permian was poor in life it was very interesting. The
amphibians had been growing in strength during the later stages of
the Carboniferous age, and may possibly have been more numerous then
than at any other time, for the vast swamps were very favourable for
them. They diminished in the Permian, though the Permian amphibians
showed some advances, and began to assume a likeness to reptiles.
Perhaps the reptiles may have first appeared in the Carboniferous,
but they declared themselves in the Permian age. Two great branches
of reptiles seem already to have defined themselves; perhaps they
had never formed a common group as reptiles, but had separated while
still amphibians. The one bore resemblance to, and were perhaps the
forerunners of, the great hosts of lizards, crocodiles, dinosaurs,
ichthyosaurs, and flying saurians, which are the most pronounced
of the reptiles, and of which we shall have a great deal to say
presently. The other group were perhaps the ancestors of the turtles
and plesiosaurs which appeared later, and possibly led the way to
the mammals. This rapid and diverse spreading out of the reptiles
in a period when life as a whole was at a low ebb is not a little
remarkable. These creatures seem to show the arrival of a more
pronounced form of _air-breathing_ animal; and that may have been the
consequence of the presence of more oxygen in the earth's atmosphere.
Of the Permian amphibians, one of the most interesting was like the
Sphenodon, which still creeps about the northern islands of New
Zealand. The most striking of the reptiles was the _Naosaurus_, a
beast-like creature with a high back of spines webbed together like a
solid porcupine. It was from three to ten feet in length.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account