The Romance of Modern Geology: Describing in simple but exact language the making of the earth with some account of prehistoric animal lifeGrew, Edwin Sharpe
Science
The Romance of Modern Geology: Describing in simple but exact language the making of the earth with some account of prehistoric animal life
Grew, Edwin Sharpe
Geology; Paleontology
What were the Stone Ages? In the long years before primitive man
learned to weld iron or bronze he formed his weapons and his tools
from stone and flint; and geologists and antiquarians have discovered
several of these "Ages of Stone" of different periods. For example,
the Stone Age which our grandfathers spoke of is now called the
Neolithic Age; and in the second quarter of the last century it
became gradually admitted that man had existed earlier than that and
had swung hammers and chipped edges in what we now call Palæolithic
times. That would put man back to the age of the Mammoth. But in the
last quarter of last century a new claim arose. The Palæolithic stone
weapons and tools were made 150,000 years ago, and were manufactured
with great skill and even artistic feeling. Within the last ten years
much rougher flint implements of peculiar types have been found in
gravels which are 500 to 700 feet above the level of the existing
rivers--in the drift of which Palæolithic implements were found. To
these older, clumsier weapons and tools--if, indeed, implements they
be--the name Eoliths was given by Mr. J. Allen Brown. These Eoliths
of the south of England and of Belgium indicate a race of men of
less developed skill than the makers of the Palæoliths, and carry
the antiquity of man at least as far back beyond the Palæoliths as
these are from the present day. So much for speculation. But are the
Eoliths truly implements, or are they, as a determined school of
anthropologists assert, merely flints which fortuitously resemble
the rougher variety of true Palæolith? The strongest attack made on
their authenticity comes from Professor Boule and M. Laville, of the
French School of Mines, who say that in the flint waste of a cement
factory at Mantes they have discovered "pseudo-Eoliths" which are
made by the action of the water of the mill, and which resemble every
known variety of the so-called "Eolith." Their suggestion is that
Eoliths were not made by man at all but were produced by the action
of running water. To which the Eolithic anthropologists retort that
Eoliths ought surely to be produced by running water now, and that
some Seine-made Eoliths would be more convincing. The differences
between the Mantes specimens and the "true" Eolith cannot be detected
by the untrained eye; but, spite of the French sceptics, the school
of believers in the genuineness of the Eolith is growing.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account