The Romance of Modern Geology: Describing in simple but exact language the making of the earth with some account of prehistoric animal lifeGrew, Edwin Sharpe
Science
The Romance of Modern Geology: Describing in simple but exact language the making of the earth with some account of prehistoric animal life
Grew, Edwin Sharpe
Geology; Paleontology
There remains the question of the probability of life on the Moon or
on Mars; and the question of possible life on the Moon is specially
worth consideration, because the earth's satellite was once part of
the earth's mass. We may first repeat briefly the explanation which
Sir G. H. Darwin has given of the Moon's separation from the earth.
If a flexible hoop or ring is spun very rapidly it will be seen to
flatten itself at top and bottom (or, as we might say, at its poles)
and broaden itself out at its middle or equator. The semi-liquid
earth once rotated so rapidly that its swelling equatorial belt was
almost at the point of separation from the parent body. Before this
occurred, however, the tension was so great that one large portion
of the protuberance, where it was weakest, broke away, and began
to move around the earth at a considerable distance from it. There
are several estimates of the bulk of the earth thus shot off; but
we may assume that about one-fiftieth of the earth escaped thus. It
must have consisted of a considerable portion of the earth's solid
crust, and a much larger quantity of the molten rocks of the earth's
interior.
The Moon is much lighter than the earth. The earth taken as a whole
weighs about five and a half times as much as water. If we consider
its surface alone, this weighs rather more than two and a half times
the weight of water--from which it can be seen that the interior of
the earth is very much denser than the earth's surface crust.[11]
The Moon weighs rather less than three and a half times its bulk
in water. This shows clearly that the Moon is composed of material
scraped off from the outer surface of the earth, rather than of
matter obtained from a considerable depth. At the same time the layer
of material removed had an appreciable thickness. The volume of the
Moon is equivalent to a solid body whose surface is equal to the
area of all the earth's oceans, and whose depth would be thirty-six
miles. It seems probable, therefore, that at the time when the Moon
was torn off, or shot off, from the earth, the parent body had a
solid crust averaging at least thirty-six miles in thickness, while
beneath this crust the temperature was so high that the materials
underneath were molten or liquid, and in other places were only kept
solid by the enormous pressure of the material above them. When
the Moon separated from the earth three-quarters of this crust was
carried away. It has sometimes been supposed that the remainder was
torn into two parts, one of which formed the great land area of the
Eastern Hemisphere and the other the great land area of which North
and South America are the relics in the Western Hemisphere. These two
great areas, at that time, floated on the semi-liquid surface like
two large ice-floes. But they were, of course, a good deal heavier
than ice, and the molten stuff on which they floated was a good deal
heavier than water. Later on this liquid stuff cooled and hardened.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account