The Romance of Modern Invention: Containing Interesting Descriptions in Non-technical Language of Wireless Telegraphy, Liquid Air, Modern Artillery, Submarines, Dirigible Torpedoes, Solar Motors, Airships, &c. &c.Williams, Archibald
Science
The Romance of Modern Invention: Containing Interesting Descriptions in Non-technical Language of Wireless Telegraphy, Liquid Air, Modern Artillery, Submarines, Dirigible Torpedoes, Solar Motors, Airships, &c. &c.
Williams, Archibald
Inventions
The steam locomotive creates its own motive force, and as long as it
has fuel and water can act independently. The electric locomotive, on
the other hand, receives its power through metallic conductors from
some central station. Should the current fail all the traffic on the
line is suspended. So far the advantage rests with the steamer. But
as regards economy the superiority of the current is obvious. In
the electric systems under consideration--the monorail and
Berlin-Zossen--there is less weight per passenger to be shifted, since
a comparatively light motor supersedes the heavy locomotive. The cars
running singly, bridges and track are subjected to less strain, and
cost less to keep in repair. But the greatest saving of all is made in
fuel. A steam locomotive uses coal wastefully, sending a lot of latent
power up the funnel in the shape of half-expanded steam. Want of space
prevents the designer from fitting to a moving engine the more
economical machinery to be found in the central power-station of an
electric railway, which may be so situated--by the water-side or near
a pit’s mouth--that fuel can be brought to it at a trifling cost. Not
only is the expense of distributing coal over the system avoided, but
the coal itself, by the help of triple and quadruple expansion engines
should yield two or three times as much energy per ton as is developed
in a locomotive furnace.
Many schemes are afoot for the construction of high-speed railways.
The South-Eastern plans a monorail between Cannon Street and Charing
Cross to avoid the delay that at present occurs in passing from one
station to the other. We hear also of a projected railway from London
to Brighton, which will reduce the journey to half-an-hour; and of
another to connect Dover and London. It has even been suggested to
establish monorails on existing tracks for fast passenger traffic, the
expresses passing overhead, the slow and goods trains plodding along
the double metals below.
But the most ambitious programme of all comes from the land of the
Czar. M. Hippolyte Romanoff, a Russian engineer, proposes to unite St.
Petersburg and Moscow by a line that shall cover the intervening 600
miles in three hours--an improvement of ten hours on the present
time-tables. He will use T-shaped supports to carry two rails, one on
each arm, from which the cars are to hang. The line being thus double
will permit the cars--some four hundred in number--to run to and fro
continuously, urged on their way by current picked up from overhead
wires. Each car is to have twelve wheels, four drivers arranged
vertically and eight horizontally, to prevent derailment by gripping
the rail on either side. The stoppage or breakdown of any car will
automatically stop those following by cutting off the current.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account