The Romance of Modern Invention: Containing Interesting Descriptions in Non-technical Language of Wireless Telegraphy, Liquid Air, Modern Artillery, Submarines, Dirigible Torpedoes, Solar Motors, Airships, &c. &c.Williams, Archibald
Science
The Romance of Modern Invention: Containing Interesting Descriptions in Non-technical Language of Wireless Telegraphy, Liquid Air, Modern Artillery, Submarines, Dirigible Torpedoes, Solar Motors, Airships, &c. &c.
Williams, Archibald
Inventions
On May 6, 1896, after a long wait for propitious weather, the
aerodrome was despatched on a trial trip. It rose in the face of the
wind and travelled for over half a mile at the rate of twenty-five
miles an hour. The water and fuel being then exhausted it settled
lightly on the water and was again launched. Its flight on both
occasions was steady, and limited only by the rapid consumption of its
power-producing elements. The Professor believes that larger machines
would remain in the air for a long period and travel at speeds
hitherto unknown to us.
In both the machines that we have considered the propulsive power was
a screw. No counterpart of it is seen in Nature. This is not a valid
argument against its employment, since no animal is furnished with
driving-wheels, nor does any fish carry a revolving propeller in its
tail. But some inventors are strongly in favour of copying Nature as
regards the employment of wings. Mr. Sydney H. Hollands, an
enthusiastic aeromobilist, has devised an ingenious cylinder-motor so
arranged as to flap a pair of long wings, giving them a much stronger
impulse on the down than on the up stroke. The pectoral muscles of a
bird are reproduced by two strong springs which are extended by the
upward motion of the wings and store up energy for the down-stroke.
Close attention is also being paid to the actual shape of a bird’s
wing, which is not flat but hollow on its under side, and at the front
has a slightly downward dip. “Aerocurves” are therefore likely to
supersede the “aeroplane,” for Nature would not have built bird’s
wings as they are without an object. The theory of the aerocurve’s
action is this: that the front of the wing, on striking the air, gives
it a downwards motion, and if the wing were quite flat its rear
portion would strike air already in motion, and therefore less
buoyant. The curvature of a floating bird’s wings, which becomes more
and more pronounced towards the rear, counteracts this yielding of the
air by pressing harder upon it as it passes towards their hinder edge.
[Illustration: _M. Santos Dumont’s Airship returning to Longchamps
after doubling the Eiffel Tower, October 19, 1901._]
The aerocurve has been used by a very interesting group of
experimenters, those who, putting motors entirely aside, have floated
on wings, and learnt some of the secrets of balancing in the air. For
a man to propel himself by flapping wings moved by legs or arms is
impossible. Sir Hiram Maxim, in addressing the Aeronautical Society,
once said that for a man to successfully imitate a bird his lungs must
weigh 40 lbs., to consume sufficient oxygen, his breast muscles 75
lbs., and his breast bone be extended in front 21 inches. And unless
his total weight were increased his legs must dwindle to the size of
broomsticks, his head to that of an apple! So that for the present we
shall be content to remain as we are!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account