The Romance of Modern Invention: Containing Interesting Descriptions in Non-technical Language of Wireless Telegraphy, Liquid Air, Modern Artillery, Submarines, Dirigible Torpedoes, Solar Motors, Airships, &c. &c.Williams, Archibald
Science
The Romance of Modern Invention: Containing Interesting Descriptions in Non-technical Language of Wireless Telegraphy, Liquid Air, Modern Artillery, Submarines, Dirigible Torpedoes, Solar Motors, Airships, &c. &c.
Williams, Archibald
Inventions
Let us assume that we are photographing a red object, a flower-pot for
instance. The red negative represents the pot by a dark deposit. The
positive printed off will consequently show clear glass at that spot,
the unaffected gelatine being soluble. So that to dye the plate would
be to make all red _except_ the very part which we require red; and on
holding it up to the light the flower-pot would appear as a white
transparent patch.
How then is the problem to be solved?
Mr. Shepherd’s process is based upon an ordered system of
prisoner-taking. Thus, as red in this particular case is wanted it
will be attained by the _other two_ positives (which are placed in
contact with the red positive, so that all three coincide exactly),
robbing white light of all _but_ its red rays.
Now if the other positives were dyed green and violet, what would
happen? They would not produce red, but by robbing white light between
them of red, green, and violet, would produce blackness, and we should
be as far as ever from our object.
The positives are therefore dyed, not in the same colours as the
screens used when the negatives were made, but in their
_complementary_ colours, _i.e._ as explained above, those colours
which added to the colour of the screen would make white.
The red screen negative is therefore dyed (violet + green) = blue. The
green negative (red + violet) = pink. The violet negative (red +
green) = yellow.
To return to our flower-pot. The red-screen positive (dyed blue) is,
as we saw, quite transparent where the pot should be. But behind the
transparent gap are the pink and yellow positives.
White light (= violet + green + red) passes through pink (= violet +
red), and has to surrender all its green rays. The violet and red pass
on and encounter yellow (= green + red), and violet falls a victim to
green, leaving red unmolested.
If the flower-pot had been white all three positives would have
contained clear patches unaffected by the three dyes, and the white
light would have been unobstructed. The gradations and mixtures of
colours are obtained by two of the screens being influenced by the
colour of the object. Thus, if it were crimson, both violet and
red-screen negatives would be affected by the rays reflected by it,
and the green screen negative not at all. Hence the pink positive
would be pink, the yellow clear, and the blue clear.
White light passing through is robbed by pink of green, leaving red +
violet = crimson.
COLOUR PRINTING.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account