The Romance of Modern Invention: Containing Interesting Descriptions in Non-technical Language of Wireless Telegraphy, Liquid Air, Modern Artillery, Submarines, Dirigible Torpedoes, Solar Motors, Airships, &c. &c.Williams, Archibald
Science
The Romance of Modern Invention: Containing Interesting Descriptions in Non-technical Language of Wireless Telegraphy, Liquid Air, Modern Artillery, Submarines, Dirigible Torpedoes, Solar Motors, Airships, &c. &c.
Williams, Archibald
Inventions
This inventor is, however, an enthusiast about the future awaiting the
submarine as a social factor. His boat has been tested by long voyages
on and below water with complete success. The _Argonaut_ also upon one
occasion travelled a thousand miles with five persons, and proved
herself “habitable, seaworthy, and under perfect control.”
Mr. Holland confidently anticipates in the near future a Channel
service of submerged boats run by automatic steering-gear upon cables
stretched from coast to coast, and eloquently sums up its advantages.
The passage would be always practicable, for ordinary interruptions
such as fog and storms cannot affect the sea depths.
An even temperature would prevail summer and winter, the well-warmed
and lighted boats being also free from smoke and spray.
No nauseating smells would proceed from the evenly-working electric
engines. No motion cause sea-sickness, no collision be apprehended--as
each line would run on its own cable, and at its own specified depth,
a telephone keeping it in communication with shore.
In like manner a service might be plied over lake bottoms, or across
the bed of wide rivers whose surface is bound in ice. Such is the
submarine boat as hitherto conceived for peace or war--a daring
project for the coming generation to justify.
ANIMATED PICTURES.
Has it ever occurred to the reader to ask himself why rain appears to
fall in streaks though it arrives at earth in drops? Or why the
glowing end of a charred stick produces fiery lines if waved about in
the darkness? Common sense tells us the drop and the burning point
cannot _be_ in two places at one and the same time. And yet apparently
we are able to see both in many positions simultaneously.
This seeming paradox is due to “persistence of vision,” a phenomenon
that has attracted the notice of scientific men for many centuries.
Persistence may be briefly explained thus:--
The eye is extremely sensitive to light, and will, as is proved by the
visibility of the electric spark, lasting for less than the millionth
part of a second, _receive_ impressions with marvellous rapidity.
But it cannot get rid of these impressions at the same speed. The
duration of a visual impression has been calculated as one-tenth to
one-twenty-first of a second. The electric spark, therefore, appears
to last much longer than it really does.
Hence it is obvious that if a series of impressions follow one another
more rapidly than the eye can free itself of them, the impressions
will overlap, and one of four results will follow.
(_a_) _Apparently uninterrupted presence_ of an image if the
same image be repeatedly represented.
(_b_) _Confusion_, if the images be all different and
disconnected.
(_c_) _Combination_, if the images of two or a very few objects
be presented in regular rotation.
(_d_) _Motion_, if the objects be similar in all but one part,
which occupies a slightly different portion in each
presentation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account