The romance of the animal world : $b Interesting descriptions of the strange & curious in natural historySelous, Edmund
Science
The romance of the animal world : $b Interesting descriptions of the strange & curious in natural history
Selous, Edmund
Animal behavior; Animals
But take him at his more ordinary figure—fifty to seventy feet or
so—and what a gigantic monster he is! In appearance, from the point
of the nose—where he seems to have been sawn through—to the middle of
the back, he is like an enormous black tree-trunk. From here the body
tapers, or rather slopes steeply, to the tail, where first a shape
is observable—that, namely, with which we are familiar in the tail,
or caudal fin, of almost every fish. Unlike the latter, however, the
tail or “_flukes_” of the cachalot—as well as every other whale—lies
flat-ways in the water, with its two points shooting out at right angles
to the two sides, instead of to the back and belly of the creature. The
difference is like that between the way a plank floats on the water, and
the way in which the keel of a boat cuts through it. It seems curious
that there should be such a difference here between the whale and the
fish tribe, seeing that in each the tail has been gradually developed
to meet the requirements of a similar mode of life. This being so, one
might have supposed that the plan of the tail would have been the same
in each, on the principle that one way—as represented by the whole class
of fishes—must be better than any other. Apparently, however, this
is not the case, since cetaceans, on the whole, swim as well and as
swiftly as fish. The tail in their case, and not the two hinder limbs,
as with seals, has been modified into a fin, and it is curious that in
the beaver, where it has also been modified to a considerable extent, in
this direction the expansion has likewise been lateral and not vertical.
We see the same thing in the case of many crustaceans, and throughout
nature this principle of attaining the same end by a variety of means is
apparent. This should teach us that it is a great mistake to think, as
people often do think, that the particular way in which any animal does a
certain thing is the only, or best way, in which it might conceivably be
done. Even a man—if a clever one—might think of some improvement in the
structure of most animals, in relation to their habits of life. Only he
could not carry out these improvements. Nature alone can do that, and in
her own time and way she is always ready to do so.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account