The romance of the animal world : $b Interesting descriptions of the strange & curious in natural historySelous, Edmund
Science
The romance of the animal world : $b Interesting descriptions of the strange & curious in natural history
Selous, Edmund
Animal behavior; Animals
Mr. Bullen then—and I quote him as an authority—says at page 188 of his
_Idylls of the Sea_: “As the result of personal observation extending
over a good many years, I assert that the Exocetus _does fly_. I
have often seen a flying-fish rise two hundred yards off, describe
a semicircle, and, meeting the ship, rise twenty feet in the air
perpendicularly, at the same time darting off at right angles to its
previous course. Then, after another long flight, when just about to
enter the water, the gaping jaws of a dolphin gave it pause and it rose
again, returning, almost directly, upon its former course. This procedure
is so common that it is a marvel it has not been more widely noticed. A
flying-fish of mature size can fly a thousand yards. It does not flap
its fins as a bird, but they vibrate like the wings of an insect, with a
distinct hum. The only thing which terminates its flight involuntarily is
the drying of its fin-membranes and their consequent stiffening.”
CHAPTER XXIII
THE SEA-SERPENT—MANY OCCASIONS ON WHICH IT HAS BEEN
SEEN—CONSCIENTIOUS SCEPTICISM OF SCIENTIFIC MEN—A FIGHT
BETWEEN MONSTERS—THE LARGEST LAND-SERPENT—SNAKES AND
SNAKE-STONES—MEDICAL EVIDENCE—A COLONIAL REMEDY.
It used to be thought that the great whales—the cachalot, the rorqual,
and the Greenland whale—were the largest of ocean’s dwellers, but if
evidence is of any value whatever, there is one marine creature that is
larger even than they—indeed, so much larger and more powerful that he is
able to make them his prey, conquering them—even the mighty sperm-whale
himself—by main strength put forth in single combat. This portentous
monster is, of course, the great sea-serpent, which has been seen, at
intervals, probably from time immemorial, and recorded also from, at
least, as far back as 1734. In 1740 we have Bishop Pontoppidan’s word for
its appearance—and we know now that he was right about the kraken—who
describes it as having a length of 600 feet; and in 1822 it was again
seen off Norway, and again it was 600 feet long; so, perhaps, it was the
same one.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account