The Romance of the Microscope: An interesting description of its uses in all branches of science, industry, agriculture, and in the detection of crime, with a short account of its origin, history, and developmentEaland, C. A. (Charles Aubrey)
History
The Romance of the Microscope: An interesting description of its uses in all branches of science, industry, agriculture, and in the detection of crime, with a short account of its origin, history, and development
Ealand, C. A. (Charles Aubrey)
Microscopes; Microscopy
First of all, we must place a little of our sand upon a piece of black
paper and examine by reflected light. We shall soon notice that sand
is anything but the simple gritty looking substance it appears on the
sea shore. At least four different substances are certain to be seen;
if the sand be clean, we shall see bright glassy crystals of quartz;
angular, sharp-edged pieces of flint; minute, flat, glistening plates
of mica and the broken remains of shells. Should our sand be taken from
a spot in the vicinity of volcanic rocks, it will probably contain
opaque pieces of magnetite; we may not recognise these when we see
them, but they may be separated from the rest of the sand by means of
a magnet, to which they will adhere. Probably our sample of sand will
be dirty or stained with iron, in this event we may wash it with weak
acid, then after drying, we may examine by transmitted light and the
various crystals will show up well.
Let us take some clay as our next example. Clay is the substance from
which the rocks known as shale and slate have been formed. We cannot
see much of the structure of clay with our microscope so let us wash
it and, by so doing separate it into its components. We must put a
little clay into a tumbler of water and stir it vigorously for some
little time, then still stirring, if we pour off the muddy liquid into
another tumbler, we shall find that our old friend sand has settled to
the bottom. Clay then is merely mud and sand, but we must not throw
this sand away without examining it for, very frequently, beautiful
minute fossils are to be found amongst it. Little creatures dwelling in
the mud, become buried in it and, as more and more mud is formed above
them, and it becomes partly solidified in the form of clay, they become
fossilized.
If now we examine a piece of sandstone with our pocket lens we shall
find that it very closely resembles the sand we have already studied.
It may be so soft that we can break it up in our fingers, then if we
examine the powdered sandstone beneath the microscope we shall need
to be experts to tell whether we are examining sand or sandstone.
Should our rock be too hard to break up in our fingers the addition
of a little weak acid will reduce it to sand. We see now that a
large proportion of sand and a small proportion of mud result in the
formation of sandstone, whereas if the proportions are reversed and we
have more mud than sand the resulting rock is known as shale or slate.
In shale we very frequently find fossils, in sandstone rarely, for the
reason that structures buried in the mud, destined to become shale,
are protected from the atmosphere and the action of water; sandstone,
on the other hand, is porous, moisture trickles through it and any
delicate structures which may have been buried in it are more likely
to decompose than to become fossilized.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account