Austria accepted the scheme, and Russian agents were sent to agitate in
the Slav provinces of Turkey. In 1787 Catherine herself made an imposing
journey in the south. Turkey clearly saw the threat to its Empire, and
in 1787 it declared war. Potiamkin, Catherine’s favourite at the
time, was entrusted with the supreme command, and marched south. Then
the ever-ready Swede fell upon the flank of Russia, and Catherine, who
could from St. Petersburg hear the roar of the Swedish guns on the
Baltic, had a momentary fright. She called up all her energy and stirred
her commanders, and in the following year she had peace with Sweden and
was free to attack Turkey, in conjunction with the Austrians. The
details do not concern us. The war lasted five years, and a little more
of the coast of the Black Sea was brought within the Russian Empire. It
may be added, briefly, that continued internal trouble in Poland, of
which Catherine took as mean an advantage as any, led to the second and
third partitions of that country. Poland ceased to exist; the once great
kingdom, ruined by the quarrels and obstinate conservatism of its
nobles, was divided between Russia, Prussia, and Austria.
The vast addition to her territory which Catherine obtained from the
spoils of Poland will not be regarded by the modern mind as a title to
glory. More creditable was the wresting of territory from the Turks, but
her chief merit lies in the reform-edicts (she counted 211 of her ukases
under that head) with which she sought to uplift Russia. Against this we
have her personal repute as it is given in many historians. There were
those at the time who called her “the Messalina of the north,” and
writers on her still differ in their estimate of her moral personality.
That she was, in the narrow sense of the word, flagrantly immoral no one
questions. We may recall that Europe at large was still very far from
the standard of these matters which adorns our generation. Paris under
Louis XV, or the Directorate, or even Napoleon; London under the
Georges; even Rome under the Popes of the period would not pass modern
scrutiny. Russia was a little more mediæval than the others, and
Catherine inherited a court in which an Empress of advanced years and
conspicuous piety had given an example of wild debauch. To a woman of
Catherine’s views and strong personality there would seem to be no
reason for restraint; and she observed none.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account