But the dark development of the Revolution turned her zeal for France
and democracy into hatred. In 1791 she wrote that if the Revolution
succeeded it would be as bad for Europe as if Dchingis Khan had come to
life again. In 1793, when she heard of the execution of the king, she
wrote: “The very name of the French must be exterminated.” She proposed
that all the Protestant nations should embrace the Greek religion “in
order to preserve themselves from the irreligious, immoral, anarchic,
scoundrelly, and diabolical pest, the enemy of God and of thrones; it
alone is apostolic and truly Christian.” We see the new Russia already
foreshadowed: a Russia fighting western ideas in the name of sound
ideals. But Catherine took no action beyond controlling the importation
of French literature. Even in that she showed her old personality. She
read the Parisian journal, the _Moniteur_, herself before she allowed it
to circulate. One day she found herself described in it as “the
Messalina of the North.” “That’s my business,” she said; and she allowed
the issue to pass.
The second source of annoyance was her son Paul. It seems--though the
point is disputed--that from the first she was cold to him (a fair
indication that he was Peter’s son), and to her grief he grew up
into a counterpart, in some respects, of Peter. It is said that she one
day learned that he asked why his mother had killed his father and
occupied the throne. He visited Frederick at Berlin against her wish,
and he married a German princess, the Princess of Hesse, whom she
disliked. This lady died in 1776, and he then married another German
princess, the Princess of Württemberg. He was thoroughly German,
flattered and duped by Frederick. “Russia will become a province
of Prussia when I am dead,” Catherine sighed.
In 1781 she sent the pair on a tour of Europe. “The Count and Countess
du Nord,” as they styled themselves, had a magnificent reception at
Paris, which made little impression on Paul, and a fresh grievance
awaited them on their return. Their sons, the little grand Dukes
Alexander and Constantine, had been removed by the Tsarina for
education, and she declined to give them up. The Prince and his wife had
to live apart, and Paul brooded darkly over every feature of his
mother’s conduct. He had the Romanoff taint in a form not unlike that we
find in Peter III, except as regards drink and coarseness. He was moody,
irritable, sensitive, suspicious, and obstinate. He quarrelled with
every good man, and as a result had about him a circle of dissembling
adventurers. Some said that he was epileptic; others that he took drugs.
It is said that when he was at Vienna an actor refused to play Hamlet,
observing that one Hamlet was enough.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account