One of the most disturbing features in the mind of conservatives was the
way in which young women adopted the advanced creed. The attempts of
Peter the Great to break down the barriers which confined the life of
women had almost ceased at his death. In the world of wealth, as
Tolstoi’s novels show, women kept the liberty of the reigns of Elizabeth
and Catherine. The new austerity of the court was not accompanied by any
general asceticism amongst the aristocracy. The philosophy of anarchy
provided a principle for what had hitherto been an inconsistent defiance
of religious traditions which were nominally respected. But the mass of
Russian women and girls, above the level of the peasantry, had hitherto
been unaffected by these liberties of the aristocracy. Now the cry of
the emancipation of woman penetrated remote country houses, and many a
girl broke loose from the control of a tearful mother or an infuriated
father, and sought the centre of enlightenment in the city. The
authorities refused to allow unmarried women to attend the higher
schools. They retorted, as Roman women had done nearly two thousand
years before, by entering into fictitious marriages. Gradually they won
the right to attend certain lectures at the university, and many of them
were found in the students’ circles where the reconstruction of
the universe was heatedly discussed.
The next development was that the intellectuals decided to educate the
workers. An officer of the army resigned his commission and turned
weaver. Sophia Perovskaia and other daughters of wealthy parents got
into touch with the working and domestic women. The police of the “Third
Section” (the secret police created by Nicholas) grew in numbers and
dogged the steps of these fiery young apostles. In 1866 a man named
Karakosoff, who had formed a society to promote the welfare of the
people, attempted to shoot the Tsar. An isolated fanatic, the Tsar was
told; and at that time there was certainly no real organisation of
assassination. But the pressure of the police and the daily risk of
arrest drove the agitation underground, and to their new quarters the
spies and informers and police followed them. There was now, plainly, no
question of persuading Alexander II to complete his scheme of reform.
There was increasing question of making war upon him and the autocracy.
It was the Russian tradition. When a Tsar was obnoxious you removed him;
but to do so in the name of justice, not in the name of a covetous group
of courtiers, was revolution of the worst order.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account