On this last feature some built a faint hope. Germany was now an
Empire, and the “League of the Three Emperors” (Germany, Austria
and Russia) boded no good for democracy. Bismarck encouraged both
the policy of repression in Russia and the policy of aggression
abroad because he did _not_ wish to see Russia develop her mighty
resources. On the other hand, Alexander was a soldier, a man steeped
in the Romanoff tradition of a divine autocracy and entirely out of
sympathy with humanitarian or progressive ideas. The only question
was whether from policy he would follow the lead of Melikoff. When
the oath of allegiance was taken he announced, ambiguously, that he
would walk in the steps of his father. Which set of steps? Melikoff
showed him the draft of a pseudo-constitution initialled by the late
Tsar. “There will be no change,” he said. But men were uncertain.
The fearful end of his father must have embittered him. The rebels
were, of course, drastically punished. Eight hundred more arrests
were made. Sophia Perovskaia, the wonderful woman of those bloody
days, and four others were executed. There is a grounded suspicion
that they were first tortured. Another woman was condemned, but
she was pregnant, and her sentence was changed to exile.
It is thought by many that an injudicious step taken by the
revolutionaries helped to fix the Tsar’s plan. They somehow got into his
hands a long letter or manifesto, in which, while pleading for reform,
they very plainly held a sword over his head; and their demands were not
at all moderate. I doubt if Alexander III ever hesitated. His strong and
narrow mind and soldierly attitude disposed him to “enforce discipline.”
Pobiedonostseff was soon at his side. He was Procurator of the Holy
Synod (since the preceding year). When Melikoff’s scheme was
brought forward for discussion he bitterly opposed it, and predicted
that it would ruin Russia. He was now a Russophile of the narrowest and
most fanatical description. Alexander leaned to that side. The German
Emperor had, he said, warned his father against making any concessions
to constitutionalism. The “Holy League”--a fanatical Russophile society
led by the Grand Duke Vladimir--pressed for coercion.
Out of the struggle there emerged at last (on April 29th) the new Tsar’s
message to his people. It was probably written by Pobiedonostseff. In it
Alexander firmly contended that the autocracy was of divine origin, and
he would protect it against all encroachments. But the reforms granted
by his father would not be withdrawn. Education, popular councils,
municipal institutions, and so on, were to be maintained. The people
were to be admitted to some share in the management of the Empire’s
affairs. That was to be the note of the new reign: something more
moderate than Pobiedonostseff and less “advanced” than Melikoff.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account