The Romance of War Inventions: A Description of Warships, Guns, Tanks, Rifles, Bombs, and Other Instruments and Munitions of Warfare, How They Were Invented & How They Are EmployedCorbin, Thomas W.
History
The Romance of War Inventions: A Description of Warships, Guns, Tanks, Rifles, Bombs, and Other Instruments and Munitions of Warfare, How They Were Invented & How They Are Employed
Corbin, Thomas W.
Inventions; Military art and science; Naval art and science
It is to this coupling together of tuned circuits that Marconi's most
famous patent relates. It is registered in the British Patent Office
under the number 7777, and hence is known as the "four sevens" patent.
It has been the subject of much litigation, which proves its
exceptional importance, and it is to the fact that the Marconi Company
have been able to sustain their rights under it that they owe their
commanding position to-day in the realm of wireless telegraphy.
The Receiving Apparatus also consists of a separate local circuit which
can be coupled when desired to the antenna circuit through a
transformer. The same simple tuning arrangement is made to affect this
circuit also, so that the "multiple tuner," as the instrument is called,
controls all the circuits both for sending and for receiving. The
oscillations caused in the antenna circuit by the action upon it of the
etherial waves flowing from the distant transmitting station pass
through one winding of the transformer and thereby induce similar
oscillations in the local receiving circuit which are made perceptible
by the receiving instrument.
Reference has already been made to the original form of receiving
apparatus called the Coherer. This, however, has been very largely
superseded by the Magnetic Detector of Marconi and the Crystal Detector,
both of which make the signals perceivable as buzzing sounds in the
telephone.
The magnetic detector owes its existence to the fact that oscillations
tend to destroy magnetism in iron. It is believed that every molecule of
iron is itself a tiny magnet. If that be so one would expect every piece
of iron to be a magnet, which we know it is not. We can always make a
piece of iron into a magnet by putting another magnet near it, but when
we take the other magnet away the iron loses its power, or to be
precise it _almost_ loses it. A piece of even the best and softest iron
having once been magnetized retains a little magnetic power which we
call "residual" magnetism.
All this is easily explained if we remember first that a heap of tiny
magnets lying higgledy-piggledy would in fact exhibit no magnetic power
outside the heap. If, however, we brought a powerful magnet near them it
would have the effect of pulling a lot of them into the same position,
of arranging them in fact so that instead of all more or less
neutralizing each other they could act together and help each other.
Then the heap would become magnetic. On removing the powerful magnet,
however, a lot of the little ones would be sure to fall down again into
their old places and so the heap would at once lose a large part of its
power, yet some would remain and so it would retain a certain amount of
"residual" magnetism. If, then, you were to give the table on which the
little magnets rest a good shake, the "higgledy-piggledyness" would be
restored and even the "residual" magnetism would vanish.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account