The Romance of War Inventions: A Description of Warships, Guns, Tanks, Rifles, Bombs, and Other Instruments and Munitions of Warfare, How They Were Invented & How They Are EmployedCorbin, Thomas W.
History
The Romance of War Inventions: A Description of Warships, Guns, Tanks, Rifles, Bombs, and Other Instruments and Munitions of Warfare, How They Were Invented & How They Are Employed
Corbin, Thomas W.
Inventions; Military art and science; Naval art and science
These weapons which made history so fast were of the kind called
howitzers, a name mentioned just now. It should be explained here that
gunners talk of guns and howitzers as if the latter were not guns; but
that is only a convenient habit which has grown up, for the latter are
unquestionably guns. The distinction is, however, so convenient that we
may well adopt it ourselves for the rest of this chapter.
Repeated references have been made already to the question of the length
of guns, and it has been pointed out that to get high velocity, great
range and vigorous hitting power a gun needs to be as long as possible.
On ships this is only limited by the strength of the steel of which the
gun is made, for beyond a certain length the gun bends of its own
weight. Ashore, however, the difficulties of transport impose a further
limitation in most cases, although the famous 4·7, like many other naval
guns, has a length of 50 calibres, and the guns of small calibre do
approximate somewhat to the proportions of the naval guns, since even
then their length comes within manageable limits.
Modern warfare, however, requires the use of larger shells containing
larger charges of explosives, and to fire these requires guns of greater
calibre. We hear of shells of as great a diameter as 16 inches being
thrown into the Belgian fortresses and of course nothing smaller than a
16-inch gun could do that. Now a 16-inch gun, if made to the naval
proportions of 50 calibres or even 45 calibres, would mean a length of
at least 60 to 70 feet. It would also mean a weight exceeding 100 tons,
for the 12-inch naval gun of 50 calibres weighs about 70 tons. And it is
easy to see that such a gun would be very difficult to move on the field
of battle. Indeed, it would be almost useless because of the time it
would take to get it into position and to construct the foundations
which it would need. If the Austrians had only had such as those the
Belgians would have had plenty of time to prepare for them at Antwerp,
whereas it was the quickness with which they brought up their heavy guns
that astonished everyone and took their opponents by surprise.
The secret of this astonishing performance lies in the fact that they
were not guns at all but howitzers, which instead of being long, slender
tubes are short, fat ones, and that involves a different idea in gunnery
altogether. The "gun" fires _at_ an object. The howitzer fires its shell
upwards with the purpose of dropping it _upon_ the object.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account