The Romance of War Inventions: A Description of Warships, Guns, Tanks, Rifles, Bombs, and Other Instruments and Munitions of Warfare, How They Were Invented & How They Are EmployedCorbin, Thomas W.
History
The Romance of War Inventions: A Description of Warships, Guns, Tanks, Rifles, Bombs, and Other Instruments and Munitions of Warfare, How They Were Invented & How They Are Employed
Corbin, Thomas W.
Inventions; Military art and science; Naval art and science
The difference between the two is well illustrated by the methods of
practising with them. In learning to work a gun the gunners fire at a
vertical target just as those of you who practise shooting at a
miniature range fire at a target of paper placed vertically against a
wall. The target for howitzer practice, on the other hand, is a square
marked out on the level ground, and the object of the gunners is to see
how great a proportion of a given number of shots they can drop inside
that square.
Of course, being so much shorter the howitzers cannot throw a shell so
far or at such a high velocity as the naval guns, but that can to a
certain extent be compensated for by using a higher explosive for the
propellant. That, however, involves greater stresses in the tube when
firing takes place and also calls for stronger foundations in order that
the aim may be steady.
A great part, too, of the velocity of a naval shell is required for the
penetration of the armour, whereas against forts or earthworks it is
sufficient if the shell "gets there."
Moreover, generally speaking, it is possible to get much nearer to a
fortress or entrenched position for the purpose of attacking it than it
is to an enemy ship on the sea. Except for the occasional help of a mist
there is no "cover" to be obtained at sea, while on land the ground must
be very flat indeed if there is no low hill or undulation behind which a
gun can be set up unnoticed.
The Austrians cherish a piece of steelwork from one of the forts of
Antwerp which they smashed with a shell from one of their big howitzers
at a range of seven miles. They evidently were able to get their big
howitzers within that comparatively short distance of the Antwerp
fortifications without being molested.
[Illustration: A GERMAN AUTOMATIC PISTOL.
The action is fully described on the illustration.]
In this connection one often hears the word mortar used, and just a
reference to that will be appropriate here. Many years ago short guns
which threw their balls very high were in use, and because of their
resemblance to the mortar which is used for pounding up things with the
aid of a pestle these were termed mortars. Later a man named Howitzer
introduced a type of gun which was something of a compromise between the
long thin gun and the short stubby mortar. As time has gone on, however,
the mortars have grown in length while the howitzers have shortened,
until to-day the two names are used almost indiscriminately to denote
the same thing. Hence the giant howitzers of the Austrians are often
spoken of as the "Skoda" mortars, Skoda being the name of the factory
where they were made.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account