The Romance of War Inventions: A Description of Warships, Guns, Tanks, Rifles, Bombs, and Other Instruments and Munitions of Warfare, How They Were Invented & How They Are EmployedCorbin, Thomas W.
History
The Romance of War Inventions: A Description of Warships, Guns, Tanks, Rifles, Bombs, and Other Instruments and Munitions of Warfare, How They Were Invented & How They Are Employed
Corbin, Thomas W.
Inventions; Military art and science; Naval art and science
The manufacture of guns, it may be remarked, owes more to one man than
to any other, namely, Mons. Gustave Canet, a French engineer who, having
fought in the Franco-German War, decided to devote his engineering
talents to developing the artillery of his native land. He spent many
years in England but later established works at Havre for the
manufacture of guns upon improved methods, finally merging his interests
into those of the great French armament firm of Schneider of Creusot.
By French and English artillerists at all events the name of Canet is
regarded with reverence.
But to get back to our naval gun. It will be clear that operations such
as have been described, involving the handling of great tubes fifty feet
or more in length, heating them as required, dipping them in oil while
hot and so on, can only be carried out at works specially designed for
the purpose.
The furnaces where the tubes are heated are well-like formations in the
ground, deep enough to take the tube vertically. To lift them in and out
there have to be tall travelling cranes capable of catching the tube by
its upper end and lifting it right out of the furnace so that its lower
end clears the ground. To accomplish this with a little to spare the
cranes need to be seventy feet or so high.
Then there are deep pits full of oil so that a tube can be heated in a
furnace, drawn out by a crane and quickly dropped into the adjacent oil
bath. Likewise there have to be pits of a third kind wherein a cold tube
can be set up while a hot one is dropped over it for the purpose of
shrinking the latter on.
Then, of course, there have to be lathes of gigantic dimensions capable
of taking a length of nearly sixty feet and of swinging an object
weighing anything up to fifty tons. But of those machines we can only
pause to make mention, for we must pass on to the breech-block, in some
ways the most interesting part of the gun.
When it was first suggested to leave the back end of the gun open so
that the powder and projectiles could be put in that way instead of
through the muzzle, people at once foresaw how much would depend upon
the arrangements for stopping up the hole while the gun was fired. For,
of course, the force of the explosion is exerted equally in all
directions, backward just as much as forward, so that unless very
securely fixed the stopper closing the breech would be liable to become
a projectile travelling in the wrong direction. To fix such a thing
securely enough to avoid accidents would surely take up too much time
and so largely neutralize any advantage arising from its use. These
fears were, indeed, to some extent justified by accidents which actually
occurred with the early examples of breech-loading guns, and for that
reason our own authorities for a time looked askance at breech-loaders.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account