American essays -- 20th century; Literature -- History and criticism
No other laboratory can ever compare with this in importance for us.
Racial or national jealousies do not enter into our calculations
here. We have no more right as Americans or Britons or Frenchmen or
Germans to be jealous of the primacy of Greece in such matters than
to be jealous of the multiplication tables because they happen to
enjoy a certain strategic position with regard to other facts. It
is true that we are no longer allowed the luxury of believing, with
the eighteenth century, for instance, that in looking back to Greece
we are looking at the very fathers of the race, who “discovered not
devised” the rules of nature, which until then there had been no men
to find out. All the more, however, are the Greeks instructive to us
when we realize that they, too, had to free themselves from immensely
ancient bonds of tradition and superstition. What clear reason did
for them, ceaselessly revolving and inquiring, it has at least a
chance to do for us, if we want it to. Study the Greeks and you are
likely to stop hugging prejudices, or taking pride in them. Study the
Greeks, and a hundred petty reverences fall away in a light as lucid
as the Athenian atmosphere. Our own day’s work concerns us every day,
as it did the Greeks, but, as a good maxim says, the man who knows
only his business does not know his business. Why will some one not
speak out and say what events have lately shown—that a knowledge of
history and literature is indispensable in affairs, and that only
those men, barring a genius or two, have shown any conspicuous talent
for leadership in our terrible decade who have known something about
history and literature? It is true. If we were beasts, we should not
especially need history; we should have instinct. But having, as men,
exchanged instinct for reason, we need as much of the past as we can
get—remembering that every man is free, thanks to the multiplication of
records, to choose his own past; that is, to choose that part of human
history between him and Adam which to him is worth most. The Middle
Ages are good to illustrate devotion; the Renaissance, passionate
individualism; the rise of the Americas, civilized men pitted against
virgin nature. But Greece surpasses them all not only in reasonableness
but also in completeness and sharpness of outline. She is the best
microcosm, with the scale best adjusted to our vision. She is the best
crystal, most purely revealing the vast matters therein pictured; she
is the best laboratory, and under the simplest and loveliest conditions
exhibits the processes of life which ordinarily appear confused and
vexed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account