The Royal Institution: Its Founder and First ProfessorsJones, Bence
History
The Royal Institution: Its Founder and First Professors
Jones, Bence
Davy, Humphry, Sir, 1778-1829; Royal Institution of Great Britain; Rumford, Benjamin, Graf von, 1753-1814; Young, Thomas, 1773-1829
In his manners he had something of the stiffness of the Quaker
remaining, and, though he never said or did a rude thing, he never
made use of any of the forms of politeness. Not that he avoided
them through affectation; his behaviour was natural, without
timidity, and easy without boldness. He rarely associated with
the young men of the College, who called him, with a mixture of
derision and respect, ‘Phenomenon Young,’ but he lived on familiar
terms with the Fellows in the Common Room. He had few friends of
his own age or pursuits in the University, and not having been
introduced to many of those who were distinguished either by their
situation or talent, he did not seek their society, nor did they
seek him; they did not like to admit the superiority of anyone in
_statu pupillari_, and he would not converse with anyone but as an
equal.
It is difficult to say how he employed himself; he read little, and
though he had access to the College and University libraries he was
seldom seen in them. There were no books piled on his floor, no
papers scattered on his table, and his room had all the appearance
of belonging to an idle man.
I once found him blowing smoke through long tubes, and I afterwards
saw a representation of the effect in the ‘Transactions of the
Royal Society,’ to illustrate one of his papers upon sound; but
he was not in the habit of making experiments. He walked little
and rode less; but, having learnt to ride the great horse abroad,
he used to _pace_ round Parker’s Piece on a hackney: he once made
an attempt to follow the hounds, but a severe fall prevented any
future exhibition.
He seldom gave an opinion, and never volunteered one. He never laid
down the law like other learned doctors, or uttered apophthegms
or sayings to be remembered. Indeed, like most mathematicians
(though we hear of abstract mathematics), he never seemed to think
abstractedly. A philosophical fact, a difficult calculation,
an ingenious instrument, or a new invention, would engage his
attention; but he never spoke of morals, of metaphysics, or of
religion. Of the last I never heard him say a word, nothing in
favour of any sect, or in opposition to any doctrine; at the same
time, no sceptical doubt, no loose assertion, no idle scoff, ever
escaped him.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account