The Royal Institution: Its Founder and First ProfessorsJones, Bence
History
The Royal Institution: Its Founder and First Professors
Jones, Bence
Davy, Humphry, Sir, 1778-1829; Royal Institution of Great Britain; Rumford, Benjamin, Graf von, 1753-1814; Young, Thomas, 1773-1829
I didn’t arrive in London until the 20th of September. On my
arrival I found that Count Rumford had altered his plans of
absence, and had left London on that very day for the Continent,
purposing to return in about two months. He is now at Paris, and in
about a fortnight we expect him here.
* * * * *
I yesterday ascertained rather an important fact; namely, that
a galvanic battery may be constructed _without any metallic
substance_. By means of ten pieces of well-burnt charcoal, nitrous
acid, and water, arranged alternately in wine-glasses, I produced
all the effects usually obtained from zinc, silver, and water.
The Bakerian lecture[34] by Dr. Young, our Lecturer on Natural
Philosophy, is now reading before the Royal Society. He attempts
to revive the doctrine of Huygens and Euler, that light depends
upon undulations of an ethereal medium. His proofs (_i.e._ his
presumptive proofs) are drawn from some strong and curious
analogies he has discovered between light and sound.
* * * * *
You should fix your permanent residence in London, where alone you
can do what you ought--instruct and delight numbers of improved
men. I am, my Friend, yours with unfeigned esteem and respect,
HUMPHRY DAVY.
On January 5, 1802, a syllabus of Davy’s course of lectures on
Chemistry was printed at the press of the Royal Institution. He wrote
for it the following advertisement:
It is generally admitted that the best method of teaching the
sciences is to begin with simple facts, and gradually to proceed
from them to the more complicated phenomena.
In the following pages, which contain the outlines of a course of
lectures on Chemistry, an attempt has been made to employ such a
method. Hence the abstruse doctrines concerning the imponderable
fluids have been separated from the history of simple chemical
action, and the applications of the science from the science
itself. The classification of substances adopted is founded
rather upon facts than analogies, and in consequence certain
bodies have been placed among the simple principles which, from
their resemblance to other bodies of known composition, have
been generally arranged in the class of compounds. This is an
imperfection, but on the principles assumed it could not easily be
avoided. And it will be fortunate for the author if a discerning
public should not discover many more important imperfections.
Part I. ‘The Chemistry of Ponderable Substances.’
Part II. ‘The Chemistry of Imponderable Substances.’ Div. 1,
of Heat or Caloric; Div. 2, of Light; Div. 3, of the Electric
Influence; Div. 4, of Galvanism.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account