The Royal Institution: Its Founder and First ProfessorsJones, Bence
History
The Royal Institution: Its Founder and First Professors
Jones, Bence
Davy, Humphry, Sir, 1778-1829; Royal Institution of Great Britain; Rumford, Benjamin, Graf von, 1753-1814; Young, Thomas, 1773-1829
‘You are not ignorant that numbers even of the most respectable
gentlemen in America have been torn from their families, confined in
gaols, and their property confiscated; that many of those in this city,
whose religious tenets secured them from suspicion of entertaining
designs of hostility, have been ignominiously imprisoned, and without
even the colour of a judicial proceeding, banished from their tenderest
connections into the remotest part of another province. Nor can it be
unknown to you that many have suffered death from tortures inflicted
by the unrelenting populace under the eye of usurped yet passive
authority; that some have been dragged to trial for their loyalty
and, in cruel mockery of law, condemned and executed; that others are
now perishing in loathsome dungeons, and that penal edicts are daily
issuing against all who hesitate to disavow, by a solemn oath, the
allegiance they owe and wish to pay to their sovereign.’
General Howe shows the exasperation of the Royalists also. He says:
‘Members of committees, collectors of arbitrary fines, &c., oppressors
of the peaceable inhabitants, have been seized by the exasperated
inhabitants of different parts of the country and delivered into my
hands.’
[2] The pamphlet here referred to was Lord Sheffield’s ‘Observations on
the Commerce of the American States.’
[3] So great was the economy practised that the daily expense for
fire-wood in the kitchen, where dinner was provided for 1,000 people,
was only twelve Kreutzers, or fourpence halfpenny. Sometimes 1,500 were
fed in one day.
[4] The great mistake which has been committed in most of the attempts
to introduce a spirit of industry where habits of idleness have
prevailed, has been the too frequent use of coercive measures. Force
will not do. It is address which must be used on those occasions.
The children in the House of Industry at Munich who, being placed on
elevated seats round the hall where other children worked, were made
to be idle spectators of that amusing scene, cried most bitterly when
their request to descend from their seats and mix in that busy crowd
was refused; but they would most probably have cried still more had
they been taken abruptly from their play and forced to work. Men are
but children of a larger growth, and those who undertake to direct them
ought ever to bear in mind that important truth.
[5] This was the prospectus of the Royal Institution.
[6] This was a model one quarter of the full size of the new Bavarian
six-pounder with its ammunition waggon. The Elector permitted him to
present it to the United States.
[7] The President wrote to Secretary McHenry: ‘I should not scruple to
give him any of the appointments you mention, and leave it with you to
make such proposals to him through Mr. King within the limits you have
drawn in your letter as you should think fit.’
[8] Notwithstanding this his daughter said her father objected to her
marrying Sir C. Blagden.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account