The Royal Mail: Its Curiosities and RomanceHyde, James Wilson
History
The Royal Mail: Its Curiosities and Romance
Hyde, James Wilson
Postal service -- Great Britain
In April 1873, a letter was posted in a certain village in Ayrshire,
addressed by a wife to her husband, who was in command of a vessel bound
for New York. The letter was properly directed to the captain by name,
it bore the name of his ship, and was addressed to the care of the
British Consul, New York. The captain never received the letter, and
this circumstance gave rise, upon his return from sea, to what is
described as a "feud" between him and his wife,--he, reposing perhaps
greater faith in the Post-office than in the dutiful attentions of his
wife, believing that his better-half had not written to him, since he
failed to receive the letter on application at its place of address in
New York. Time, with its incessant changes, hopes, fears, joys, and
disappointments, winged its hurried flight for a period of eleven years
ere the matter which had caused the feud came to be fully understood. At
the end of that time the same letter was returned to the writer through
the Dead-letter Office, having (according to the stamp upon it) been
unclaimed at New York. It was stated that the return of the letter had
"put all to rights" between the couple concerned, though it is to be
hoped that the healing hand of Time had already done much in this
direction, and that the return of the long-lost letter did nothing more
than put the finishing touch to restored confidence. In connection with
this matter, it was afterwards ascertained that the letter was one of
over 4000 similar letters returned to the New York Post-Office from the
offices of the British Consul in that city, upon a new appointment being
made to the Consulate,--the "new broom," as one of his first acts,
having made a clean sweep of this accumulation of letters, some of which
had been lying there no less than seventeen years. How far the failure
of these letters to reach the persons addressed was due to their not
having been called for, or to the negligence of clerks at the
Consulate, is not known, nor will it ever be ascertained what
heart-burnings and misery may have been occasioned by this wholesale
miscarriage of correspondence.
In March 1880, a letter plainly addressed to an individual by name, and
bearing the name and number of a street in a certain district of London,
reached the Dead-letter Office, whither it had been sent by the postman
of the district, owing to the person to whom it was directed not being
known at the address given. When opened, with a view to its return to
the writer, the letter was discovered to contain a Bank of England note
for £100, together with a short memorandum suggesting the return of the
note to some person, but in such vague and general terms that no one who
had not had previous information on the subject could have fully
understood the purport of the message.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account