The Royal Observatory, Greenwich: A Glance at Its History and WorkMaunder, E. Walter (Edward Walter)
History
The Royal Observatory, Greenwich: A Glance at Its History and Work
Maunder, E. Walter (Edward Walter)
Astronomy -- History; Royal Observatory, Greenwich
One point, however, these old constellations do tell us, and tell
us plainly. They show that the axis of the earth, which, as the
earth travels round the sun, moves parallel with itself, yet, in
the course of ages, itself rotates so as in a period of some 26,000
years to trace out a circle amongst the stars. This is the cause of
what is called 'precession,' and explains how it is that the star
we call the pole-star to-day was not always the pole-star, nor will
always remain so. We learn this fact from the circumstance that
the old constellations do not cover the entire celestial sphere.
They leave a great circular space of 40° radius unmapped in the
southern heavens. This simply means that the originators of the
constellations lived in 40° north latitude, and stars within 40° of
their south pole never rose above their horizon, and consequently
were never seen, and could not be mapped, by them. In like manner,
the star census taken at Greenwich Observatory does not include
the whole sky, but leaves a space some 52° in radius round our
south pole. Since the latitude of Greenwich is nearly 52° north,
stars within that distance of the south pole do not rise above our
horizon, and are never seen here. But if we compare the vacant space
left by the old original constellations with the vacant space left
by a Greenwich catalogue of to-day, we see that the centre of the
first space, which must have been the south pole of that time, is
a long way from the centre of the second space--our south pole of
to-day. The difference tells us how far the pole has moved since
those old forgotten astronomers did their work. We know the rate
at which the pole appears to move, by comparing our more modern
catalogues one with another; and so we are able to fix pretty nearly
the time when lived those old first census-takers of the stars,
whose names have perished so completely, but whose work has proved
so immortal.
These old workers gave us the constellation groupings and names
which still remain to us, and are still in common, every-day use.
Their work affords us the most striking illustration of the result
of precession, but precession itself was not recognized till nearly
3000 years after their day, when a marvellous genius, Hipparchus,
established the fact, and 'built himself an everlasting name' by
the creation of a catalogue of over 1000 stars prepared on modern
principles. That catalogue formed the basis of one which survives to
us at the present time, and was made some 1750 years ago by Claudius
Ptolemy, the great astronomer of Alexandria, whose work, which still
bears the proud name of _Almagest_, 'The Greatest,' remained for
fourteen centuries the one universal astronomical text-book.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account