The ruined cities of Mashonaland: Being a record of excavation and exploration in 1891Bent, J. Theodore (James Theodore)
History
The ruined cities of Mashonaland: Being a record of excavation and exploration in 1891
Bent, J. Theodore (James Theodore)
Extinct cities -- Zimbabwe -- Mashonaland; Great Zimbabwe (Extinct city)
No one, of course, is prepared
to say exactly where the kingdom of Punt was; the consensus of opinion
is that it was Yemen, in the south of Arabia. But suppose it to be
there, or suppose it to be on the coast of Africa, opposite Arabia, or
even suppose it to be Zimbabwe itself, the question is the same: where
did they get the large supply of gold from, which they poured into
Egypt and the then known world? In Mashonaland we seem to have a direct
answer to this question. It would seem to be evident that a prehistoric
race built the ruins in this country, a race like the mythical Pelasgi
who inhabited the shores of Greece and Asia Minor, a race like the
mythical inhabitants of Great Britain and France who built Stonehenge
and Carnac, a race which continued in possession down to the earliest
dawnings of history, which provided gold for the merchants of Phœnicia
and Arabia, and which eventually became influenced by and perhaps
absorbed in the more powerful and wealthier organisations of the
Semite.
CHAPTER VII
THE GEOGRAPHY AND ETHNOLOGY OF THE MASHONALAND RUINS
The ancient geography of the east coast of Africa is a subject fraught
with difficulties on all sides. To begin with, our authorities are not
only meagre, but they are men who had no practical knowledge of the
subject, and who knew next to nothing of the vast extent of commercial
operations which were going on outside the limits of the Red Sea. The
written accounts come to us from either an Alexandrian or Roman source,
whereas the practical knowledge possessed by the Arabs themselves of
these outer waters is lost to us for ever. It was probably the
monopolising policy of the Semitic nations which induced them to
conceal from other countries the whereabouts of their commercial
relations, which on the one hand extended outside the pillars of
Hercules to the Canaries and Great Britain, and on the other hand
outside the Straits of Bab-el-Mandeb to India, China, and the east
coast of Africa. Of these two directions the voyage to Great Britain
was undoubtedly the most adventurous, the navigation of the Indian
Ocean with a knowledge of the monsoons, which the Arabian who lived on
it must have had from time immemorial, presenting far less difficulty.
Hippalus has the credit of introducing the monsoons to Western
civilisation, but surely a seafaring race like the Arabians, who lived
on the spot, must have known all about them long before his day; and
just as they were reticent on the subject of their voyages, so were
they reticent on the subject of the localities from which their
merchandise came. The knowledge given us by Marinus of Tyre, by the
anonymous author of the ‘Periplus of the Red Sea,’ by Ptolemy, by
Pliny, and others, was obviously not the knowledge possessed by the
traders of the world, for they do not even attempt to elucidate the
question of where the precious commodities came from which they
enumerate.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account