The Ruins; Or, Meditation on the Revolutions of Empires and the Law of NatureVolney, C.-F. (Constantin-François)
Religion
The Ruins; Or, Meditation on the Revolutions of Empires and the Law of Nature
Volney, C.-F. (Constantin-François)
Ethics; History -- Philosophy; Religions; Revolutions
"But even you," replied the simple men, "with all your science, you are
not agreed; of what advantage, then, is your science? Besides, how can
you answer for us? If the faith of one man is applicable to many, what
need have even you to believe? your fathers may have believed for you;
and this would be reasonable, since they have seen for you.
"Farther, what is believing, if believing influences no action? And what
action is influenced by believing, for instance, that the world is or is
not eternal?"
"The latter would be offensive to God," said the doctors.
"How prove you that?" replied the simple men.
"In our books," answered the doctors.
"We do not understand them," returned the simple men.
"We understand them for you," said the doctors.
"That is the difficulty," replied the simple men. "By what right do you
constitute yourselves mediators between God and us?"
"By his orders," said the doctors.
"Where is the proof of these orders?" said the simple men.
"In our books," said the doctors.
"We understand them not," said the simple men; "and how came this just
God to give you this privilege over us? Why did this common father
oblige us to believe on a less degree of evidence than you? He has
spoken to you; be it so; he is infallible, and deceives you not. But
it is you who speak to us! And who shall assure us that you are not in
error yourselves, or that you will not lead us into error? And if we
should be deceived, how will that just God save us contrary to law, or
condemn us on a law which we have not known?"
"He has given you the natural law," said the doctors.
"And what is the natural law?" replied the simple men. "If that law is
sufficient, why has he given any other? If it is not sufficient, why did
he make it imperfect?"
"His judgments are mysteries," said the doctors, "and his justice is not
like that of men."
"If his justice," replied the simple men, "is not like ours, by what
rule are we to judge of it? And, moreover, why all these laws, and what
is the object proposed by them?"
"To render you more happy," replied a doctor, "by rendering you better
and more virtuous. It is to teach man to enjoy his benefits, and not
injure his fellows, that God has manifested himself by so many oracles
and prodigies."
"In that case," said the simple men, "there is no necessity for so many
studies, nor of such a variety of arguments; only tell us which is the
religion that best answers the end which they all propose."
Immediately, on this, every group, extolling its own morality above
that of all others, there arose among the different sects a new and most
violent dispute.
"It is we," said the Mussulmans, "who possess the most excellent morals,
who teach all the virtues useful to men and agreeable to God. We profess
justice, disinterestedness, resignation to providence, charity to
our brethren, alms-giving, and devotion; we torment not the soul with
superstitious fears; we live without alarm, and die without remorse."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account