Country life -- England; England -- Social life and customs -- 19th century
“Ay, but”--they turn round upon you suddenly with what they deem a
decisive and unanswerable argument--“Ay, but they cannot approve of
making the miseries of sentient creatures a pleasure.” What! is there no
pleasure in feasting upon crabs that have been scalded, and eels that
have been fried alive? In sucking the juices of an oyster, that has
gaped in fiery agony between the bars of your kitchen grate? But the
whole argument is a sophism and a fallacy. Nobody _does_ seek a
pleasure, or make an amusement of the misery of a living creature. The
pleasure is in the pursuit of an object, and the art and activity by
which a wild creature is captured, and in all those concomitants of
pleasant scenery and pleasant seasons that enter into the enjoyment of
rural sports;--the _suffering_ is only the _casual adjunct_, which you
would spare to your victim if you could, and which any humane man will
make as small as possible. And over what, after all, do these very
sensitive persons lament? Over the momentary pang of a creature, which
forms but one atom in a living series, every individual of which is both
pursuing and pursued, is preying, or is preyed upon. The fish is eagerly
pursuing the fly, one fish is pursuing the other, and so it is through
the whole chain of living things; and this is the order and system
established by the very centre and principle of love, by the beneficent
Creator of all life. The too sensitively humane, will again
exclaim--“Yes, this is right in the inferior animals: it is their
nature, and they only follow the impulse which their Maker has given
them.” True; but what is right in them, is equally right in man;--the
argument applies with double force in his case. For, is there no such
impulse implanted in him? Let every sportsman answer it; let the history
of the world answer it; let the heart of every nine-tenths of the human
race answer it. Yes, the very fact that we do pursue such sports, and
enjoy them, is an irrefragable answer. The principle of chase and taking
of prey, which is impressed on almost all living things, from the
minutest insect to the lion of the African desert, is impressed with
double force on man. By the strong dictates of our nature, by the very
words of the Holy Scriptures, every creature is given us for food; our
dominion over them, is made absolute. The amiable Cowper asserted that
dogs would not pursue game, if they were not taught to do so. We admit
the excellent nature of the man, but every day proves that, in this
instance, he was talking beyond his knowledge. Every one who knows
anything of dogs, knows, that if you bring them up in a town, and keep
them away from the habits of their own class to their full growth, the
moment they get into the country they will pursue each their peculiar
game, with the utmost avidity, and after their own manner. There is
then, unquestionably, an instinctive propensity in one animal to prey
upon another--in man pre-eminently so--and it is not the work of wisdom
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account