The Russian Army and the Japanese War, Vol. 1 (of 2): Being Historical and Critical Comments on the Military Policy and Power of Russia and on the Campaign in the Far EastKuropatkin, A. N. (Alekseĭ Nikolaevich)
History
The Russian Army and the Japanese War, Vol. 1 (of 2): Being Historical and Critical Comments on the Military Policy and Power of Russia and on the Campaign in the Far East
Kuropatkin, A. N. (Alekseĭ Nikolaevich)
Russo-Japanese War, 1904-1905
The readiness of their army for mobilization, owing to their adoption
of a territorial system, and the consequent short distances the
depôt troops had to travel, was known to be very complete. We knew
that the troops could complete their mobilization in three or four
days, while the supply and other departments would require seven to
ten. Information as to transports available showed that even in 1902
they could have collected in seven days 86 ships with an aggregate
displacement of 224,000 tons, and in fourteen days 97 ships with a
displacement of 268,000. For a mobilized division about 40,000 tons are
required for a journey of more than forty-eight hours, while 20,000
tons would suffice for a journey of less than forty-eight hours.
Thus the tonnage available was sufficient to allow embarkation to be
commenced at once on completion of mobilization of six divisions for a
journey of not more than forty-eight hours, or of almost the whole army
for a lesser distance.
As regards the tactical readiness of the Japanese before the war, our
people in Manchuria did receive certain information. The operations of
large bodies of their troops of all arms had been commented upon by our
Headquarter Staff as follows:
“The most noticeable points in the operations of bodies consisting
of all three arms as seen at the manœuvres were—
“1. The inclination to take up too extended defensive positions.
“2. A hard-and-fast, inelastic form of attack independent of local
conditions.
“3. The absence of proper flank protection both on the march and in
action.
“4. The tendency, when on the move, to keep the main body too far
from the advance guard, which would in consequence have to fight
unsupported for a long time.
“5. The absence of a definite objective in the attack.
“6. The tendency to use up reserves too quickly. As a result, there
are frequently no troops with which to meet turning and enveloping
movements.
“7. The disbelief in cold steel.
“8. The inclination to avoid enclosed and, in particular, hilly
ground.
“9. The inclination to use direct frontal attacks without turning
movements.
“10. The neglect of field fortifications in the defence; infantry
fire trenches, gun-pits and epaulements alone are made.
“11. The complete absence of any idea of pursuit.
“12. The tendency to retire too rapidly: the infantry of the main
body withdraws first; this is followed by the whole of the guns,
and then the remaining infantry.
“13. The disinclination for night operations.
“14. The absence of contact between divisions: each division
operates independently without keeping in touch with others; this
is due to the lack of general control by the officer in chief
command.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account