The Russian Army and the Japanese War, Vol. 1 (of 2): Being Historical and Critical Comments on the Military Policy and Power of Russia and on the Campaign in the Far EastKuropatkin, A. N. (Alekseĭ Nikolaevich)
History
The Russian Army and the Japanese War, Vol. 1 (of 2): Being Historical and Critical Comments on the Military Policy and Power of Russia and on the Campaign in the Far East
Kuropatkin, A. N. (Alekseĭ Nikolaevich)
Russo-Japanese War, 1904-1905
In spite of the lack of coaling stations _en route_, and
in the face of extraordinary difficulties, it eventually succeeded in
reaching the Sea of Japan, where it was utterly destroyed on May 27
and 28, 1905, off Tsushima. In twenty-four hours we lost 30 pennants
sunk or captured out of 47, and 137,000 from a total tonnage of
157,000. The light cruiser _Almaz_ and 2 destroyers—the _Grozni_ and
_Bravi_—alone reached Vladivostok. According to Admiral Togo’s reports,
he lost only 3 destroyers, while his casualties amounted to 7 officers
and 108 men killed, 40 officers and 620 men wounded. Many gallant
exploits were performed by our sailors in the fight: the battleship
_Suvaroff_ continued firing until she sank, and of the _Navarin’s_
complement only two men were saved; while the small ironclad _Ushakoff_
replied to the Japanese summons to surrender with a broadside, and
foundered with the whole of her crew. M. Burun closes his remarkable
article in the following words:
“Undoubtedly many tactical mistakes were among the contributory
causes of the Tsushima catastrophe: our initial error in allowing
transports to be with the fleet, the unseaworthiness and the
conspicuous colour of our ships, and many such details; but
the real cause was the unreadiness of our fleet for war, and
the criminal short-sightedness of our Administration. Such a
contingency as war was never contemplated, and the fleet was kept
up entirely for show.
“Our crews were of the best material in the world; they were
brave and capable of learning, but besides being unversed in the
use of modern implements of war (such as automatic gun-sights,
etc.), they were not accustomed to life at sea. Our officers were
possessed of a strong sense of duty, and thoroughly appreciated
the immense importance of the task before them; but they were new
to the crews and to the ships, which they had suddenly to command
against a fleet trained in the stern school of war. Born sailors,
the Japanese seamen never left their ships, while our vessels had
neither permanent nor full crews. Even in the last eight months
of the cruise of our fleet our captains were unable, owing to the
shortage of ammunition, to put their crews through a course of
gunnery, or to test their training. The ships only carried enough
ammunition for one battle. Yes, we lost our fleet because the most
important element—the _personnel_—was unprepared. We lost the war,
and lost our predominance on the Pacific Ocean, because, even while
preparing to celebrate the anniversary of the gallant defence of
Sevastopol, we quite forgot that the strength of a navy is only
created by the spirit of every individual member belonging to it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account