The Russian Army and the Japanese War, Vol. 2 (of 2): Being Historical and Critical Comments on the Military Policy and Power of Russia and on the Campaign in the Far EastKuropatkin, A. N. (Alekseĭ Nikolaevich)
History
The Russian Army and the Japanese War, Vol. 2 (of 2): Being Historical and Critical Comments on the Military Policy and Power of Russia and on the Campaign in the Far East
Kuropatkin, A. N. (Alekseĭ Nikolaevich)
Russo-Japanese War, 1904-1905
(_a_) The delay in mobilizing the reinforcements for the Far East.
(_b_) The transfer into the reserve during the war of well-trained
soldiers—men who were still liable for colour service—from the military
districts in European Russia, while untrained elderly reservists were
being sent to the front.
(_c_) The belated despatch of drafts to the front. (The reason of this
was also the inefficiency of the railways.)
(_d_) The delay in promoting those who particularly distinguished
themselves in the field. (Many recommendations were ignored.)
(_e_) The deficiencies in our technical equipment.
(_f_) The faults of organization (absence of troops for protecting
communications, dearth of transport, unwieldiness of the army and corps
organizations).
(_g_) Deficiencies in the _personnel_ both of officers and men.
The third group comprises—
(_a_) The absence of a true military feeling among the troops.
(_b_) The poor spirit in action shown by some of them.
(_c_) The lack of determination on the part of commanders of all
degrees to carry out the tasks entrusted to them.
(_d_) The breakdown of the organization under the stress of war.
The weak points of our forces, which were so noticeable in the wars
waged in the second half of the last century, had not been entirely
eliminated during the fifty years which intervened since the Crimea,
and were again evident in the recent struggle—namely:
1. We were inferior to our enemy in technical troops and equipment.
2. The “command” was unsatisfactory.
3. The army was insufficiently trained tactically.
4. We did not insure victory by having considerable superiority in
numbers.
We did not have before us any clear idea of our object, and
consequently did not show sufficient determination in its prosecution.
So many different reasons have been advanced for our failure that the
question naturally arises as to what foundation there really is for my
opinion—shared by the greater part of the army in the field—that if we
had not concluded peace so hastily victory would have crowned our arms.
My belief that we could, and ought to, have issued victorious from the
struggle is based upon—
I. The steady growth of our material forces.
II. The growth of our moral forces.
III. The gradual deterioration of the enemy
in both respects.
I.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account