The sacred dance : $b A study in comparative folkloreOesterley, W. O. E. (William Oscar Emil)
Religion
The sacred dance : $b A study in comparative folklore
Oesterley, W. O. E. (William Oscar Emil)
Dance -- Religious aspects -- History
that there was in its early origins some reason for this, for we find a
similar restriction among races of lower civilization.
This type of dance is quite distinct from the war-dance; whether there
was anything in the nature of a war-dance among the Israelites we have no
means of ascertaining; it is never even hinted at in the Old Testament.
On the other hand, there was preparation for battle in the form of
sacrifice to Jahwe.
There were some other customs regarding preparation and “consecration”
for battle among the Israelites which point to the lingering of very
old-world conceptions; this fact offers some justification for the
contention that this type of sacred dance may possibly be the remains,
in a developed form, of a rite which originally contained some similar
old-world conception. By “remains, in a developed form,” we mean a rite
shorn of its original content, but which continues to be observed, and
has a new meaning assigned to it. We have in the Old Testament distinct
references to the taboo on sexual intercourse for warriors previous to
battle (Deut. xxiii. 10, 11; 1 Sam. xxi. 4, 5 [5, 6 in Hebr.]; 2 Sam. xi.
11).
The extension of this kind of taboo to warriors on an
expedition is common among rude peoples, and we know that it
had place among the Arabs, and was not wholly obsolete as late
as the second century of Islām[305].
In reference to the rule laid down in Deut. xxiii. 10, 11, Frazer rightly
points out that
it suffices to prove that the custom of continence observed in
time of war by the Israelites, as by a multitude of savage and
barbarous peoples, was based on a superstitious, not a rational
motive. To convince us of this it is enough to remark that the
rule is often observed by warriors for some time after their
victorious return, as also by the persons left at home during
the absence of the fighting men. In these cases the observance
of the rule evidently does not admit of a rational explanation,
which could hardly, indeed, be entertained by anyone conversant
with savage modes of thought[306].
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account