The sacred theory of the Earth, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b Containing an account of the original of the Earth, and of all the general changes which it hath already undergone, or is to undergo, till the consummation of all things.Burnet, Thomas
Religion
The sacred theory of the Earth, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b Containing an account of the original of the Earth, and of all the general changes which it hath already undergone, or is to undergo, till the consummation of all things.
Burnet, Thomas
Cosmology -- Early works to 1800; Creation -- Early works to 1800; Earth (Planet) -- Early works to 1800; Keill, John, 1671-1721. Examination of Dr. Burnet's theory of the earth; Philosophy, Ancient -- Early works to 1800; Warren, Erasmus, 1642?-1718. Geologia
THE _Greeks_ and _Romans_ divided the Ages of the World into three
Periods or Intervals, whereof they call’d the first the _Obscure_
Period, the second the _Fabulous_, and the third _Historical_. The dark
and obscure Period was from the Beginning of the World to the Deluge;
what pass’d then, either in Nature, or amongst Men, they have no
Records, no Account, by their own Confession; all that Space of Time was
cover’d with Darkness and Oblivion; so that we ought rather to wonder at
those Remains they have, and those broken Notions of the Golden Age, and
the Conditions of it, how they were sav’d out of the common Ship-wrack,
than to expect from them the Philosophy of that World, and all its
Differences from the present. And as for the other Nations that pretend
to greater Antiquities, to more ancient History and Chronology, from
what is left of their Monuments, many will allow only this Difference,
that their fabulous Age begun more high, or that they had more ancient
Fables.
BUT besides that our Expectations cannot be great from the Learning of
the _Gentiles_, we have not the Means or Opportunity to inform our
selves well what Notions they did leave us concerning the primitive
World; for their Books and Monuments are generally lost, or lie hid
unknown to us. The Learning of the World may be divided into the Eastern
Learning and the Western; and I look upon the Eastern as far more
considerable for philosophical Antiquities, and philosophical
Conclusions; I say _Conclusions_, for I do not believe either of them
had any considerable Theory, or Contexture of Principles and Conclusions
together: But ’tis certain that in the East, from what Source soever it
came, humane or divine, they had some extraordinary Doctrines and
Notions disperst amongst them. Now as by the western Learning we
understand that of the _Greeks_ and _Romans_; so by the eastern that
which was amongst the _Egyptians_, _Phœnicians_, _Chaldæans_,
_Assyrians_, _Indians_, _Ethiopians_, and _Persians_; and of the
Learning of these Nations, how little have we now left? Except some
Fragments and Citations in _Greek_ Authors, what do we know of them? The
modern _Brackmans_, and the _Persees_, or _Pagan Persians_, have some
broken Remains of Traditions relating to the Origin and Changes of the
World: But if we had not only those Books entire, whereof we have now
the Gleanings and Reversions only; but all that have perish’d besides,
especially in that famous Library at _Alexandria_; if these, I say, were
all restor’d to the World again, we might promise our selves the
Satisfaction of seeing more of the Antiquities, and natural History of
the first World, than we have now left, or can reasonably expect. That
Library we speak of at _Alexandria_, was a Collection, beside _Greek_
Books, of _Egyptian_, _Chaldæan_, and all the Eastern Learning; and
_Cedrenus_ makes it to consist of an hundred thousand Volumes: But
_Josephus_ saith, when the Translation of the Bible by the _Septuagint_
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account