Pierson’s aim was to disprove Horton’s identity with the man who had
killed Ah Lam and had afterwards seen Graham. He endeavored to show
that there were two men engaged in the affair,--Horton, who had spoken
to Miss Almsford, and his confederate, who, it was argued, must have
committed the crime. When Millicent had told of the wounds inflicted by
the Chinaman on the cheeks of his murderer, it was shown that Horton’s
face bore no trace of these scratches. It was argued, in reply to this,
that in a man of Horton’s vigorous temperament such wounds might easily
be healed in as short time as had elapsed between the murder and the
trial. At this point Galbraith had a trump card to play, the existence
of which neither prisoner nor counsel had suspected. Neither had it
been learned by the omniscient reporter, through whose instrumentality
evidence is too often prematurely made public, cases are lost, and
offenders are enabled to escape apprehension.
"I would inform your Honor that I have other proof of the identity of
the prisoner with the man who passed the night following the murder in
the shooting lodge."
A new witness, by name John Du Jardin, by profession a wood-cutter, was
called to the stand.
"Have you ever seen the prisoner before?"
"Yes, before wonce," answered the old Frenchman.
"When was that?"
"The night after murder."
"Where did you see him?"
"At the little ’unting ’ouse of M. Graham."
"What were you doing at the lodge?"
Graham looked at his henchman with a perplexed expression, and smiled
slightly at the answer.
"I were not in the cabin, I were by the window, lookin’."
"Oh, you were looking in at the window; and what did you see?"
"I see monsieur, ’e sleepin’. I see dat man," pointing to the prisoner;
"’e come, and monsieur give ’im to drink and to eat."
"What else did you see?"
"I see _cet homme_, dat man lay ’imself _près_ side by the _feu_.
Presentlee ’e sleep, monsieur ’e mark ’im; ’e take faggot from fire, ’e
make point, ’e draw one picture of ’im."
Here Pierson asked the witness what he was doing outside the lodge in
the middle of the night.
"I was watch monsieur."
"That seems very strange. Why did you want to watch him?"
"’E ’as not slept the night; ’e ’as nothing eat the day; I fear ’im
_malade_. I follow him."
Galbraith continued his examination, and elicited from the witness the
admission that he had remained outside the cabin that night, concealed
in the bushes, and had only left it after Horton had taken his
departure. He had then started to return, but after he had gone a mile
he retraced his steps with the intention of cooking for his master’s
breakfast a brace of quail he had shot on the way. He found the cabin
empty, and on the wall the portrait which he had seen sketched. It was
where it would have been easily effaced, and so he had loosened the
board on which the drawing was made, and carried it to his house.
Graham was now recalled and questioned.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account