The Sanskrit drama : $b in its origin, development, theory and practiceKeith, Arthur Berriedale
History
The Sanskrit drama : $b in its origin, development, theory and practice
Keith, Arthur Berriedale
Sanskrit drama -- History and criticism
The real Indian character of the drama reveals itself in the demand for
the conventional happy ending, which shows us every person in a
condition of happiness, with the solitary exception of the evil king.
Cārudatta is restored to affluence and power from the depths of infamy
and misery; Vasantasenā’s virtue and fidelity are rewarded by the
signal honour of restoration to the rank of one whom the hero may
marry; the monk, who refuses worldly gain, has the pleasure of becoming
charged with spiritual oversight, with its attendant amenities—not
inconsiderable to judge from our knowledge of the wealth of Buddhist
monasteries. Even Saṁsthānaka is spared, to save us, we may assume, the
pain of seeing anything so unpleasant as a real, even if well deserved,
death on the stage, for the king perishes at a distance from the scene.
If, as Cārudatta asserts at the end of the play, fate plays with men
like buckets at the well, one rising as another falls, Çūdraka is not
inclined to seek realism sufficiently to permit of his introducing even
a tinge of sorrow into the close of his drama.
4. THE PRĀKRITS
No extant play exhibits anything like the variety of Prākrits found in
the Mṛcchakaṭikā, which seems almost as if intended to illustrate the
precepts of the Nāṭyaçāstra in this regard. [289] The commentator
obligingly provides us with the names of the dialects represented and
those who speak them. Çaurasenī is spoken by the director after his
Sanskrit exordium, the comedienne, Vasantasenā, Madanikā, her servant,
Karṇapūraka, her slave, her mother, the wife of Cārudatta, the Çreṣṭhin
or guildsman, and the officer of the court, and Radanikā, Cārudatta’s
servant. Avantikā is attributed to the two policemen Vīraka and
Candanaka. The Vidūṣaka speaks Prācyā. The shampooer who turns monk,
Sthāvaraka, servant of the Çakāra Saṁsthānaka, Kumbhīlaka, servant of
Vasantasenā, Vardhamānaka, servant of Cārudatta, and the little
Rohasena speak Māgadhī. The Çakāra speaks Çākārī, the Caṇḍālas who act
as headsmen Cāṇḍālī, and the chief gambler Ḍhakkī. Sanskrit, on the
other hand, is spoken by the hero, the Viṭa, the royal claimant Āryaka,
and the Brahmin thief Çarvilaka. This distribution of Prākrits agrees
with that of the Nāṭyaçāstra as we have it in one important aspect; it
ignores the Māhārāṣṭrī, though for some not obvious reason Konow claims
that this was introduced into the drama by Çūdraka. On the other hand,
it does not assign to slaves, Rājputs, or guildsmen the Ardha-Māgadhī
of the Nāṭyaçāstra. In the case of Rohasena the Māgadhī ascribed to him
has been largely converted into Çaurasenī in the manuscripts. The
Çāstra ascribes Āvantī to Dhūrtas, which is interpreted as meaning
gamblers; the distinction between it and Çaurasenī is minimal; it is
said to have s and r and be rich in proverbs by Pṛthvīdhara, and this
accords adequately with the actual speeches of the officers. But the
second, Candanaka, expressly gives himself out as a southerner, and we
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account