The Sanskrit drama : $b in its origin, development, theory and practiceKeith, Arthur Berriedale
History
The Sanskrit drama : $b in its origin, development, theory and practice
Keith, Arthur Berriedale
Sanskrit drama -- History and criticism
Bāṇa regarding him suggests that he was not known to him, while it is
certain that he knew Kālidāsa; the first writer on poetics to cite him
is Vāmana. [397] Verses not in our extant dramas are ascribed to him,
so he may have written other works than the three dramas, two Nāṭakas
on the Rāma legend and a Prakaraṇa, which we have. His friendship with
actors is a trait to which he himself refers, and efforts have been
made to trace in his works evidence of revision for stage purposes.
2. THE THREE PLAYS
Perhaps the earliest of the works is the Mahāvīracarita, but the
evidence for this is uncertain, and there is no reason to assign it
definitely to an earlier date than the Mālatīmādhava; both antedate,
perhaps considerably, the Uttararāmacarita. The Mālatīmādhava, [398] as
a Prakaraṇa, should have a plot invented by the author, and this is
true to the extent that the combination of elements which make up the
intrigue is clearly the poet’s, though the main motif of the story and
the chief episodes can all be paralleled in the Kathā literature even
as we have it.
Bhūrivasu, minister of the king of Padmāvatī, has asked an old friend,
now turned nun, Kāmandakī, to arrange a marriage between his daughter,
Mālatī, and Mādhava, son of an old friend Devarāta, minister of the
king of Vidarbha, who has sent his son to Padmāvatī, mainly in the hope
that Bhūrivasu would remember a compact of their student days to marry
their children to each other. The obstacle in the way is the desire of
Nandana, the king’s boon companion (narmasuhṛd), to wed Mālatī with the
king’s approval. Kāmandakī, therefore, decides to arrange the meeting
of the young people and their marriage, so as to be able to present the
king with a fait accompli. Both hero and heroine have friends,
Makaranda and Madayantikā, sister of Nandana, and, after Acts I and II
have made the main lovers sufficiently enamoured, in Act III, when the
lovers are meeting in a temple of Çiva, Madayantikā is in danger of
death from an escaped tiger, and is rescued by Makaranda, not without
injury. These two then are deeply in love. But Act IV shows us the king
resolved on the mating of Mālatī and Nandana; Mādhava, despairing of
success through Kāmandakī’s aid alone, decides to win the favour of the
ghouls of the cemetery by an offering of fresh flesh; this leads him in
Act V to a great adventure, for on his ghastly errand he hears cries
from a temple near by, and rushes in just in time to save Mālatī whom
the priest Aghoraghaṇṭa and his acolyte Kapālakuṇḍalā were about to
offer in sacrifice to the goddess Cāmuṇḍā. He slays Aghoraghaṇṭa. In
Act VI Kapālakuṇḍalā swears revenge, but for the moment all goes well;
Mālatī is to wed Nandana, but by a clever stratagem Makaranda takes her
place at the temple where she goes to worship before her marriage, and,
while Mādhava and Mālatī flee, Makaranda is led home as a bride. In Act
VII we hear how poor Nandana has been repulsed by his bride;
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account