The Sanskrit drama : $b in its origin, development, theory and practiceKeith, Arthur Berriedale
History
The Sanskrit drama : $b in its origin, development, theory and practice
Keith, Arthur Berriedale
Sanskrit drama -- History and criticism
A glimpse into a form of entertainment not represented by any Sanskrit
drama so far published is given by the changes made in the fourth Act
of the Vikramorvaçī at an unknown date. The Apabhraṅça stanzas
introduced into that Act cannot be assigned to the period of Kālidāsa,
unless we are to rewrite the history of the language; Apabhraṅça
represents not a vernacular but a definitely literary language in which
the vocabulary is based on Prākrit, and the inflexions on a vernacular
with free use of Prākrit forms as well. Guhasena of Valabhī, of whom we
have inscriptions of A.D. 559–69, was celebrated as a composer in
Apabhraṅça as well as in Sanskrit and Prākrit, and the new literary
form may have arisen in the sixth century A.D. as an effort to produce
something nearer the vernacular than Prākrit, but yet literary, much as
the modern dialects have evolved literatures largely by reliance on
Sanskrit. It can hardly be doubted that the Apabhraṅça stanzas
represent the libretto of a pantomime (nṛtya). Such pantomimes are well
known as a form of the nautch at Rājput courts; the dancers perform a
well-known scene, and sing verses to a musical accompaniment; the chief
element, however, is the gestures and postures. In the case of the
pantomime based on the Vikramorvaçī, the verses placed in the mouth of
the king may have been sung by an actor, while those regarding the
forsaken elephant and the Haṅsas may have been sung by singers, male or
female, acting under him. There is an introduction in Prākrit for the
libretto, which very possibly as inserted in the drama has not come
down to us in full, though in any case the libretto in such instances
is of only secondary importance and never adequate. It is a plausible
suggestion that the introduction of the libretto into the Vikramorvaçī
was the outcome of the difficulty felt by the ordinary audience in
picking up the sense of the fourth Act of the play, which contains in
overwhelming measure Sanskrit stanzas, and, therefore, must have been
extremely difficult for the audience to follow. The date of the change
is uncertain; on linguistic grounds it has been placed after Hemacandra
and before the date of the Prākṛta Pin̄gala. [581]
XII
THE CHARACTERISTICS AND ACHIEVEMENT OF THE SANSKRIT DRAMA
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account