The Sanskrit drama : $b in its origin, development, theory and practiceKeith, Arthur Berriedale
History
The Sanskrit drama : $b in its origin, development, theory and practice
Keith, Arthur Berriedale
Sanskrit drama -- History and criticism
For the dramatists the favour of a king was the chief object to be
aimed at, and kings were evidently very willing to lend their names to
dramatic and other compositions, whatever part they actually took in
their production. The persistence of the rumour which regards Harṣa as
winning his fame in part at the expense of Bāṇa, may be unjust to the
king, but at any rate it expresses what was popular belief in the
possibility of such a happening in poetical circles, and it is indeed
incredible that a king should have been so scrupulous as to refuse any
aid in his literary toils from his court poets. Competitions in
exhibitions of poetry were in favour with monarchs, but they were not
the only patrons; their actions excited imitation, [591] and even in
Buddhist and Jain circles the desire to adopt the expedient of drama in
connexion with religion was evinced. But even when applied by Brahmins,
Buddhists, or Jains to philosophy or religion, the drama bore
throughout the unmistakable stamp of its original predominance in
circles whose chief interest was gallantry: the Nāgānanda bears
eloquent evidence of this for Buddhist ideas, the Prabodhacandrodaya
for Brahmin philosophy, and the Moharājaparājaya for Jainism.
A society of this kind was certain to encourage refinement and elegance
in poetry; it was equally certain to lead to artificiality and
unreality. But we may be certain that true poetic taste existed; it is
attested not merely by the existence and fame of such dramas as those
of Kālidāsa, but in the kindred sphere of music it has an interesting
exposition in the third Act of the Mṛcchakaṭikā, in which, following
with slight changes the precedent of Bhāsa, Cārudatta is made to
express to the unresponsive ears of Maitreya, his one faithful friend,
the effect produced on his ears by the sweet singing of Rebhila, which
has come to console him in the midst of his sorrow: [592]
The notes of love, peace, sweetness, could I trace,
The note that thrills, the note of passion too,
The note of woman’s loveliness and grace,
Ah, my poor words add nothing, nothing new.
But as the notes in sweetest cadence rang,
I thought it was my hidden love who sang.
The melody of song, the stricken strings,
In undertone that half unconscious clings,
More clearly sounding as the passions rise,
But ever sweeter as the music dies.
Words that strong passion fain would say again,
Yet checks their second utterance—in vain;
For music sweet as this lives on until
I walk as hearing sweetest music still.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account