The Sanskrit drama : $b in its origin, development, theory and practiceKeith, Arthur Berriedale
History
The Sanskrit drama : $b in its origin, development, theory and practice
Keith, Arthur Berriedale
Sanskrit drama -- History and criticism
An effort is made to describe the precise nature of the mental activity
involved in the enjoyment of sentiment, and to base upon it a division
of the sentiments. The four sentiments of love, heroism, horror, and
fury are taken as primary, and brought into connexion with mental
conditions described as the unfolding (vikāsa), expansion (vistara),
agitation (kṣobha), and movement to and fro (vikṣepa) of the mind.
[672] These are evidently mental conditions, believed to be reached by
introspection, and they have the merit of giving a quasi-psychological
rationale for the doctrine of four primary and four secondary
sentiments found in the Nāṭyaçāstra. [673] But there was no early
agreement on this piece of psychology; Abhinavagupta, [674] with Bhaṭṭa
Nāyaka, accepts only three aspects of mental condition as involved, the
melting (druti), expansion, and unfolding, a division which is applied
also in the theory of poetics to justify the doctrine of the existence
of three qualities only of words. [675] On Dhanaṁjaya’s view the
sentiment of calm which he denies for drama, [676] if it exists at all,
must be regarded as combining all the four mental aspects above
distinguished.
It is now possible to understand clearly the essential relation of the
spectator to the actors; we see on the stage, for instance, Rāma and
Sītā, who excites his affection, aided by suitable circumstances of
time and place; this affection is intimated by speech and gesture
alike, which indicate both the dominant emotion of love and its
transient shapes in the various stages of love requited. The spectacle
evokes in the mind of the spectator the impressions of the emotion of
love which experience has planted there, and this ideal and generic
excitation of the emotion produces in him that sense of joy which is
known as sentiment. The fullness of the enjoyment depends essentially
on the nature and experience of the spectator, to whom it falls to
identify himself with the hero or other character, and thus to
experience in ideal form his emotions and feelings. He may even succeed
in his effort to the extent that he weeps real tears, feels terror and
sorrow, but the sentiment is still one of exquisite joy. We may compare
the thrill of pleasure which the most terrifying narration excites in
us, and we are all conscious of the sweetness of sad tales.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account