The Saxons in England, Volume 1 (of 2): A history of the English commonwealth till the period of the Norman conquestKemble, John Mitchell
History
The Saxons in England, Volume 1 (of 2): A history of the English commonwealth till the period of the Norman conquest
Kemble, John Mitchell
Great Britain -- History -- Anglo-Saxon period, 449-1066
A passage already cited in this chapter gives the wergylds of the
freeman and noble in Wessex as respectively two hundred and twelve
hundred scillingas, whence those classes are called twýhynde and
twelfhynde: these denominations correspond to the old and usual ceorl
and eorl; and as the original expression for all classes of society was,
_be it churl, be it earl_, Cnut could use as perfectly equivalent, _be
it twýhynde, be it twelfhynde_[521]. But in Wessex a third class is
mentioned, whose wergyld was half that of the twelfhynde, and three
times that of the ceorl: they are called sixhynde, men of six hundred.
It is difficult to say whether they are the original nobles, three times
as valuable as the freeman, and whether the twelfhynde are an exclusive
class of magnates, raised above them during the progressive development
of the royal power; or whether, on the contrary, the twelfhynde and
twýhynde are the original divisions, and the sixhynde a middle class of
ministerials, which sprang up when ceorls had entered the service of the
crown, and thus became raised above their fellow freemen. I incline to
the latter opinion, partly from the apparent absence of this sixhynde
class in Mercia, partly from the apposition noticed above, and the
omission of the sixhynde altogether from the passage in Eádweard’s law,
which regulates the payments for the other two classes. There is no
statement of a royal wergyld in Wessex, but from what has been said of
the composition made for Múl, it may be inferred that it was thirty
thousand sceattas or 120 pounds, like that of Mercia. The total
inconsistency of these several values will be apparent if we arrange
them tabularly:
┌───────────────┬────────────┬──────────┬──────────┬──────────
│ │ Northumb.│ Mercia.│ Wessex.│ Kent.
├───────────────┼────────────┼──────────┼──────────┼──────────
│ │ þrymsas.│ Scil.│ Scil.│ Scil.
│King │ 15000│ 7200│ 7200│ 1500
│ │ +15000│ +7200│ +7200│ +1500
│Archbishop │ 15000│ │ │
│Æðeling │ 15000│ │ │
│Bishop │ 8000│ 1200│ 1200│ 360
│Ealdorman │ 8000│ 1200│ 1200│ 360
│Hold │ 4000│ │ 600│
│Heáhgeréfa │ 4000│ │ 600│
│Priest │ 2000│ │ 600│
│Þegen │ 2000│ │ 600│
│Freeman │ 266│ 200│ 200│ 180
└───────────────┴────────────┴──────────┴──────────┴──────────
If these data be accurate, we must conclude that the ratio of the king
and noble to the ceorl in the different states varied as follows:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account