The Saxons in England, Volume 1 (of 2): A history of the English commonwealth till the period of the Norman conquestKemble, John Mitchell
History
The Saxons in England, Volume 1 (of 2): A history of the English commonwealth till the period of the Norman conquest
Kemble, John Mitchell
Great Britain -- History -- Anglo-Saxon period, 449-1066
It will readily be supposed that the task of demonstrating this is not
easy. The early period at which Christianity triumphed in England, adds
to the difficulties which naturally beset the subject. Norway, Sweden
and Denmark had entered into public relations with the rest of Europe,
long before the downfall of their ancient creed: here, the fall of
heathendom and the commencement of history were contemporaneous: we too
had no Iceland[610] to offer a refuge to those who fled from the violent
course of a conversion, preached sword in hand, and coupled with the
loss of political independence; still the progress of the new faith
seems to have been on the whole easy and continuous amongst us; and
though apostasy was frequent, history either had no serious struggle to
record, or has wisely and prudently concealed it.
-----
Footnote 610:
Thus was Iceland colonized, by men who would neither relinquish their
old belief, nor submit to the growing power of a king. The Old-saxons
had no such place of refuge, and the arms of Charlemagne prevailed to
destroy their national independence and their religion together.
-----
In dealing with this subject, we can expect but little aid from the
usual sources of information. The early chroniclers who lived in times
when heathendom was even less extinct than it now is, and before it had
learnt to hide itself under borrowed names, would have shrunk with
horror from the mention of what to them, was an execrable impiety: many
of them could have possessed no knowledge of details which to us would
be invaluable, and no desire to become acquainted with them: the whole
business of their life, on the contrary, was to destroy the very
remembrance that such things had been, to avoid everything that could
recall the past, or remind their half-converted neophytes of the creed
which they and their forefathers had held. It is obvious that, under
such circumstances, the greater and more powerful the God, the more
dangerous would he continue to be, the more sedulously would all mention
of him be avoided by those who had relinquished his service or
overthrown his altars. But though this may be the case with the
principal deities, there are others whose power, though unacknowledged,
is likely to be more permanent. Long after the formal renunciation of a
public and national paganism, the family and household gods retain a
certain habitual influence, and continue—often under other names, nay
perhaps engrafted on another creed—to inform the daily life of a people
who are still unconsciously acted upon by ancient national feelings. A
spell or a popular superstition may yet recall some traces of the old
belief, even as the heathen temple, when purified with holy water and
dedicated in another name, retained the holiness which had at first been
attached to the site of its foundation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account