The Saxons in England, Volume 1 (of 2): A history of the English commonwealth till the period of the Norman conquestKemble, John Mitchell
History
The Saxons in England, Volume 1 (of 2): A history of the English commonwealth till the period of the Norman conquest
Kemble, John Mitchell
Great Britain -- History -- Anglo-Saxon period, 449-1066
Hence in Norse he is called the _one-handed_ god, as Oþinn is the
_one-eyed_. The Teutonic gods, unlike the Indian, have not a
superfluity, but on the contrary sometimes a lack, of limbs. It is
otherwise with their horses, etc.
Footnote 659:
Hist. Goth. cap. v.
Footnote 660:
Bell. Goth. ii. 15.
Footnote 661:
Grimm, D. Myth. p. 179.
Footnote 662:
Hist. iv. 64.
Footnote 663:
Deut. Myth. pp. 180, 181.
-----
The Anglosaxon runic alphabet, which in several letters recalls the
names or attributes of the ancient gods, uses Tír for T: the German
runes wanting a Z = T, apply Ziu: there is however another rune, similar
in shape to the runic T, but having the power of EA; this bears the name
of Ear, but sometimes also in MSS. that of Tír: there are etymological
grounds on which the word Tír, _gloria_, must be connected with Tíw, and
we are hence led to the supposition that Ear may have been another name
for that god. This gains a great importance when we bear in mind that in
some parts of south Germany, the third day of the week is called, not
Zistag, but Ertag, Eritag, Erichtag, for which we should indeed have
expected Erestag: and when we find in Saxon Westphalia an undeniably
heathen spot called Eresburg, _Mons Martis_, now Mersberg, i. e.
Eresberg, the hill of Er, Ziu or Mars.
Now the Anglosaxon poem on the runic characters has something to tell us
of Ear. It says of him,
Ear bið égle
eorla gehwylcum,
ðonne fæstlíce
flǽsc onginneð
hrá cólian,
hrúsan ceósan
blác to gebeddan.
Blǽda gedréosað,
wynna gewítað,
wera geswícað[664].
that is, “Ear is a terror to every man, when fast the flesh, the corpse
beginneth to become cold and pale to seek the earth for a consort. Joy
faileth, pleasure departeth, engagements cease.” It is clear that Ear,
_spica_, _arista_, will not explain this, and we may believe that our
forefathers contemplated the personal intervention of some deity whose
contact was death. This may have been Tíw or Ear, especially in the
battle-field, and here he would be equivalent to the Ἄρης βροτολοιγός
μιαιφόνος of Homer.
-----
Footnote 664:
On the Runes of the Anglosaxons, by J. M. Kemble. Archaeologia, vol.
xxviii.
-----
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account