The Saxons in England, Volume 1 (of 2): A history of the English commonwealth till the period of the Norman conquestKemble, John Mitchell
History
The Saxons in England, Volume 1 (of 2): A history of the English commonwealth till the period of the Norman conquest
Kemble, John Mitchell
Great Britain -- History -- Anglo-Saxon period, 449-1066
The Saxon Chronicles, during the period anterior to the reign of
Ælfred, seem to know only the old general divisions: thus we have
Cantwara land, Kent[130]; Westseaxan, Súðseaxan, Eástseaxan,
Middleseaxan, Wessex, Sussex, Essex, Middlesex: Eástengle, Eastanglia:
Norðanhymbra land, Súðanhymbra land, Myrcna land, Northumberland,
Southumberland, Mercia: Lindisware and Lindisse, Lincolnshire:
Súðrige, Surrey; Wiht, the Isle of Wight; Hwiccas, the Hwiccii in
Gloucestershire and Worcestershire[131]; Merscware, the people of
Romney Marsh: Wilsætan, Dornsætan and Sumorsætan, Wiltshire,
Dorsetshire and Somersetshire[132]. But after the time of Ælfred, the
different manuscripts of the Chronicles usually adopt the word Scír,
in the same places as we do, and with the same meaning. Thus we find,
Bearrucscír, Bedanfordscír, Buccingahámscír, Defenascír, Deórabyscír,
Eoforwícscír, Gleáwanceasterscír, Grantabrycgscír, Hámtúnscír
(Southampton), Hámtúnscír (Northampton), Heortfordscír, Herefordscír,
Huntandúnscír, Legeceasterscír, Lindicolnascír, Oxnafordscír,
Scrobbesbyrigscír (but also Scrobsetan), Snotingahámscír,
Stæffordscír, Wæringwícscír or Wæringscír, Wigraceasterscír, and
Wiltunscír: Middelseaxe, Eástseaxe, Súðseaxe, Súðrige and Cent remain:
Eástengle is not divided into Norfolk and Suffolk. Thus, out of the
thirty-two shires south of the Humber, which Florence and William of
Malmesbury mention, the Chronicles note twenty-six, of which
twenty-one are distinguished as _shires_ by the word scír.
-----
Footnote 130:
The division of Kent into Eást Centingas and West Centingas is
retained by the charters till late in the eleventh century.
Footnote 131:
“Cirrenceaster adiit, qui Britannice Cairceri nominatur, quae est in
meridiana parte Huicciorum.” Asser, Vit. Ælfr. an. 879.
Footnote 132:
Where the country is considered as a territorial division, rather than
with reference to the race that possesses it, instead of sætan or
setan, _the settlers_, we have sæte, _the land settled_; thus
Sumorsæte. So Eástseaxe for Eástseaxan or Eástseaxna land; Cent for
Centingas or Cantware; Lindisse for Lindisware.
-----
In Beda nothing of the kind is to be found: the general scope of his
Ecclesiastical History rendered it unnecessary for him to descend to
minute details, and besides the names of races and kingdoms, he mentions
few divisions of the land. Still he notices the Provincia Huicciorum:
the Middelangli or Angli Mediterranei, a portion of the Mercians: the
Mercii Australes and Aquilonales: the Regio Sudergeona or Surrey: the
Regio Loidis or Elmet near York: the Provincia Meanwarorum, or Hundreds
of East and West Meon in Southampton; the Regio Gyrwiorum in which
Peterborough lies, and distinct from this, the Australes Gyrwii or South
Gyrwians.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account