The Saxons in England, Volume 2 (of 2): A history of the English commonwealth till the period of the Norman conquestKemble, John Mitchell
History
The Saxons in England, Volume 2 (of 2): A history of the English commonwealth till the period of the Norman conquest
Kemble, John Mitchell
Great Britain -- History -- Anglo-Saxon period, 449-1066
HEÁHGERÉFA.—In general the word coupled with geréfa enables us to judge
of the particular functions of the officer; but this is not the case
with the heáhgeréfa or _high reeve_, a name of very indefinite
signification, though not very rare occurrence. It is obvious that it
really denotes only a reeve of high rank, I believe always a royal
officer; but it is impossible to say whether the rank is personal or
official; whether there existed an office called the heáhgeréfscipe
(highreevedom) having certain duties; or whether the circumstance of the
shire- or other reeve being a nobleman in the king’s confidence gave to
him this exceptional title. I am inclined to believe that they are
exceptional, and perhaps in some degree similar to the Missi of the
Franks,—officers dispatched under occasional commissions to perform
functions of supervision, hold courts of appeal, and discharge other
duties, as the necessity of the case demanded; but that they are not
established officers found in all the districts of the kingdom, and
forming a settled part of the machinery of government. In this
particular sense, our judges going down upon their several circuits,
under a commission of jail delivery, are the heáhgeréfan of our day.
We are told in the Saxon Chronicle that in the year 778, Æðelbald and
Heardberht of Northumberland slew three heáhgeréfan, namely Ealhwulf the
son of Bosa, Cynewulf and Ecga: and the immediate consequence of this
appears to have been the expulsion of Æðelred, and the succession of
Ælfwold to the throne of Northumberland. These high-reeves were
therefore probably military officers of Æðelred, and Simeon of Durham,
in recording the events of the same year calls them dukes, _duces_.
Again, in 780, Simeon mentions Osbald and Æðelheard as dukes, but the
Chronicle calls them heáhgeréfan.[366]
-----
Footnote 366:
The instances cited are Northumbrian, and it is remarkable that the
chapter on Wergylds, § 4, reckons the heáhgeréfa as a separate rank,
having a high wergyld, but inferior to that of the ealdorman. I am
much inclined to think that these were sheriffs.
-----
In a preceding chapter I have shown that the _dux_ is properly
equivalent to the ealdorman, but this can hardly have been the case with
the heáhgeréfa. Again, in 1001, the Chronicle mentions three
high-reeves, Æðelweard, Leófwine and Kola, and apparently draws a
distinction by immediately naming Eádsige, the king’s reeve, not his
high-reeve. In 1002 the Chronicle again mentions Æfíc, a high-reeve, who
though a great favourite of the king, certainly never attained the rank
of a duke or ealdorman, or, as far as we know, ever performed any public
administrative functions. He was a minion of Æðelred’s, but not an
officer of the Anglosaxon state.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account