The Saxons in England, Volume 2 (of 2): A history of the English commonwealth till the period of the Norman conquestKemble, John Mitchell
History
The Saxons in England, Volume 2 (of 2): A history of the English commonwealth till the period of the Norman conquest
Kemble, John Mitchell
Great Britain -- History -- Anglo-Saxon period, 449-1066
Caesar says indeed nothing of London, yet it is difficult to believe
that this was an unimportant place, even in his day. It was long the
principal town of the Cantii, whom the Roman general describes as the
most polished of the inhabitants of Britain; and as we know that there
was an active commercial intercourse between the eastern coast of
England and Gaul, it is at least probable that a station, upon a great
river at a safe yet easy distance from the sea, was not unknown to the
foreign merchants who traded to our shores[759]. One hundred and sixteen
years later it could be described as a city famous in a high degree for
the resort of merchants and for traffic[760]: but of these years one
hundred had been spent in peace and in the natural development of their
resources by the Britons, undisturbed by Roman ambition; and we have
therefore ample right to infer that from the very first Cair Lunden had
been a place of great commercial importance. The Romans on their return
found and kept it so, although they did not establish a colonia there.
The first place which received this title with all its corresponding
advantages was Camelodunum, probably the British Cair Colun, now
Colchester in Essex[761].
-----
Footnote 759:
It is clear that Caesar was not greatly harassed in his march towards
the ford of the Thames near Chertsey; and if, as is probable, his
advance disarmed the Cantii generally, or compelled the more warlike
of their body to retire upon the force of Cassivelaunus, concentrated
on the left bank of the river, we can understand what would otherwise
seem a very dangerous movement,—a march into Surrey, leaving London
unoccupied on the right flank. Thus it seems to me that the fact of
Caesar’s not noticing the city may be more readily explained by its
not lying within the scope of his manœuvres, than by its not
existing in his time. And indeed it is probable that just here some
portion of his memoirs has been lost: for in the nineteenth chapter of
the fifth book, he distinctly says: “Cassivelaunus, _ut supra
demonstravimus_, omni deposita spe contentionis,” etc.; but nothing
now remains in what we possess, to which these words can possibly be
referred. Caesar’s Commentaries were the private literary occupation
of the great soldier in peaceful times, and we cannot attribute this
contradiction in his finished work to carelessness.
Footnote 760:
“At Suetonius mira constantia medios inter hostes Londinium perrexit,
cognomento quidem coloniae non insigne, sed copia negotiatorum et
commeatuum maxime celebre.” Tacit. Ann. xiv. 33. “Not a colonia,”
seems to me equivalent to saying, a British city.—Twenty years after
the return of the Romans to Britain, _seventy thousand_ citizens and
allies perished during Boadicea’s rebellion in London, Verulam and
Colchester. (Ibid.)
Footnote 761:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account