The Saxons in England, Volume 2 (of 2): A history of the English commonwealth till the period of the Norman conquestKemble, John Mitchell
History
The Saxons in England, Volume 2 (of 2): A history of the English commonwealth till the period of the Norman conquest
Kemble, John Mitchell
Great Britain -- History -- Anglo-Saxon period, 449-1066
Tacitus gives us an insight into some of the gratuitous insults and
vexations inflicted upon the British provincials, while he describes
the reforms introduced by Agricola into these branches of the public
service. “Ceterum animorum provinciae prudens, simulque doctus per
aliena experimenta, parum profici armis, si iniuriae sequerentur,
causas bellorum statuit excidere.... Frumenti et tributorum exactionem
aequalitate munerum mollire, circumcisis, quae in quaestum reperta,
ipso tributo gravius tolerabantur: namque per ludibrium adsidere
clausis horreis, et emere ultro frumenta, ac vendere pretio
cogebantur: devortia itinerum et longinquitas regionum indicebatur, ut
civitates a proximis hybernis in remota et avia deferrent, donec, quod
omnibus in promtu erat, paucis lucrosum fieret.” Tac. Agric. xix. The
same grave historian attributes the fierce insurrection under Boadicea
to the tyrannous conduct of the Legati and Procuratores of the
province, and the insolent conduct of their subordinates. “Britanni
agitare inter se mala servitutis, conferre iniurias et interpretando
accendere: ‘nihil profici patientia, nisi ut graviora, tanquam ex
facili tolerantibus, imperentur: singulos sibi olim reges fuisse, nunc
binos imponi: e quibus Legatus in sanguinem, Procurator in bona
saeviret. Aeque discordiam Praepositorum, aeque concordiam subiectis
exitiosam, alterius manus, centuriones alterius, vim et contumelias
miscere. Nihil iam cupiditati, nihil libidini exceptum.” Tac. Agric.
xv. It is obviously with reference to the same facts that he describes
the Britons as peaceable and well disposed to discharge the duties
laid upon them, if they are only spared insult. Tac. Agric. xiii.
Xiphilinus, who though a late writer is valuable inasmuch as he
represents Dio Cassius, describes some of the intolerable atrocities
which drove the Iceni into rebellion, destroyed Camelodunum and
Verulamium, and led in those cities and in London to the slaughter of
nearly seventy thousand citizens and allies. Deep as was the wrong
done to the family of Prasutagus, he is no doubt right in attributing
the general exasperation mainly to the confiscation of the lands which
Claudius Caesar had granted to the chiefs, and which the procurator
Catus Decianus attempted to call in. Πρόφασις δὲ τοῦ πολέμου ἑγένετο ἡ
δήμευσις τῶν χρημάτων (publicatio bonorum), ἅ Κλαύδιος τοῖς πρώτοις
αὐτῶν ἐδεδώκει· καὶ ἔδει καὶ ἐκεῖνα, ὥς γε Δεκιανὸς Κάτος ὁ τῆς νήσου
ἐπιτροπεύων ἔλεγεν, ἀναπόμπιμα γενέσθαι. Boadicea is made to declare
that they were charged with a poll-tax, so severely exacted that an
account was required even of the dead: οὐδὲ γὰρ τὸ τελευτῆσαι παρ’
αὐτοῖς ἀζήμιόν ἐστιν, ἀλλ’ ἴστε ὅσον καὶ ὑπὲρ τῶν νεκρῶν τελεοῦμεν·
παρὰ μὲν γὰρ τοῖς ἄλλοις ανθρώποις καὶ τοὺς δουλεύοντας τισιν ὁ
θάνατος ἐλευθεροῖ, Ῥωμαίοις δὲ δὴ μόνοις καὶ οἱ νεκροὶ ζῶσι πρὸς τὰ
λήμματα.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account