And although the Latin tong did faire blome and blossome
in _L. Crassus_, and _M. Antonius_, yet in _Tullies_ tyme onely, and
in Tullie himselfe chieflie, was the Latin tong fullie ripe, and
growne to the hiest pitch of all perfection.
And yet in the same tyme, it began to fade and stoupe, as
_Tullie_ him selfe, in _Brutus de Claris Oratoribus_, with weeping
wordes doth witnesse.
And bicause, emongs them of that tyme, there was some
difference, good reason is, that of them of that tyme, should be
made right choice also. And yet let the best _Ciceronian_ in
Italie read _Tullies_ familiar epistles aduisedly ouer, and I beleue
he shall finde small difference, for the Latin tong, either in
propriety of wordes or framing of the stile, betwixt _Tullie_, and
those that write vnto him. As _ser. Sulpitius, A. Cecinna,
M. Cælius, M. et D. Bruti, A. Pollio, L. Plancus_, and diuerse
Epi. Planci // other: read the epistles of _L. Plancus_ in _x. Lib._
x. lib. Epist. // and for an assay, that Epistle namely to the _Coss._
8. // and whole _Senate_, the eight Epistle in number,
and what could be, eyther more eloquentlie, or more wiselie
written, yea by _Tullie_ himselfe, a man may iustly doubt. Thies
men and _Tullie_, liued all in one tyme, were like in authoritie,
not vnlike in learning and studie, which might be iust causes of
this their equalitie in writing: And yet surely, they neyther
were in deed, nor yet were counted in mens opinions, equall
with _Tullie_ in that facultie. And how is the difference hid in
his Epistles? verelie, as the cunning of an expert Sea man, in
a faire calme fresh Ryuer, doth litle differ from the doing of
a meaner workman therein, euen so, in the short cut of a
priuate letter, where, matter is common, wordes easie, and
order not moch diuerse, small shew of difference can appeare.
But where _Tullie_ doth set vp his saile of eloquence, in some
broad deep Argument, caried with full tyde and winde, of his
witte and learnyng, all other may rather stand and looke after
him, than hope to ouertake him, what course so euer he hold,
either in faire or foule. Foure men onely whan the Latin tong
was full ripe, be left vnto vs, who in that tyme did florish, and
did leaue to posteritie, the fruite of their witte and learning:
_Varro, Salust, Cæsar_, and _Cicero_. Whan I say, these foure
onely, I am not ignorant, that euen in the same tyme, most
excellent Poetes, deseruing well of the Latin tong, as _Lucretius_,
_the ready way to the Latin tong._ 295
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account