That is almost all[107] that is actually known of adaptation with regard
to the use of an abnormal food supply. Though important, it cannot be
said to be very much. But could we expect very numerous regulations
here at all after what we laid down in a former paragraph about the
possibilities of adaptive regulation in general? The functional state
must have been altered in order that such regulations may occur. Now
there is no doubt that this state may be really altered only if an
abnormal food has first been taken in altogether by the cell-protoplasm
of the body-surfaces, but never if it has only entered the cavity of the
intestine, which, strictly speaking, is a part of the exterior medium.
Fungi indeed not only take in the abnormal food, but also know what
to do with it, but all animals are obliged to treat first with their
chemical secretions what happens to be present in their intestine, in
order that it may be taken up by their living cells, and one hardly
can wonder that these secretions are only formed in correspondence to
a limited number of outside stimuli. In fact, as soon as we look upon
what adaptive or regulatory work happens in metabolism *inside* the body
interior, we meet, even in animals, regulations of a far more developed
type.
[107] The discovery of Weinland that adult dogs are able to produce
“lactase” in their pancreas, whenever they are fed, quite abnormally,
with milk-sugar, has recently been said to be vitiated by an analytical
mistake.
Discoveries of the last few years have taught us that almost all
metabolic processes in the organism, including oxidation, are carried
out by the aid of special materials, the so-called enzymes or
ferments. These are known to exist in the most different forms even in
the inorganic world. They are simply chemical compounds, of specific
types, that bring about chemical reactions between two other chemical
materials, which in their absence would either not go on at all or would
go on very slowly. We cannot enter here into the much disputed chemical
theory of what is called “catalysis”: we can only say that there is no
objection to our regarding almost all metabolic processes inside the
organism as due to the intervention of ferments or catalytic materials,
and that the only difference between inorganic and organic ferments is
the very complicated character of the latter and the very high degree of
their specification.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account