It has been known for many years that the Protozoa are also capable of
a restoration of their form and organisation after disturbances, if at
least they contain a certain amount of their nuclear substance. This
process of restoration used to be regarded as belonging to the common
type of regeneration proper, until T. H. Morgan succeeded in showing
that in the genus *Stentor* it follows just the very lines which we know
already from our study of embryonic organs or from *Tubularia*; that
an harmonious-equipotential system is at the basis of what goes on.
Now, you know that all Protozoa are but one highly organised cell: we
have therefore here an instance where the so-called “elements” of our
harmonious-morphogenetic system are not cells, but something inside of
cells; and this feature must appear to be of very great moment, for it
first shows, as we have already pointed out on another occasion, that
morphogenesis is not dependent on cell-division, and it states at the
same time that our concept of the harmonious-equipotential system may
cover a very great area--that, in fact, it is a scheme of a very wide
extent.
*The Problem of the Factor* E
We turn back again to considerations of a more abstract form. We left
our analysis of the differentiation of the harmonious-equipotential
systems, and particularly of the phenomena of localisation during this
differentiation, at the point where we had succeeded in obtaining an
equation as the expression of all those factors on which the prospective
value, the actual fate, of any element of our systems depends, *p.v. (X)
= f(s, l, E)* was the short expression of all the relations involved;
*s* and *l*, the absolute size of the system and the relative position
of the element with respect to some fixed points, were independent
variables; *E* was a constant, namely, the prospective potency, with
special regard to the proportions embraced by it.
We shall now study the significance of the factor *E*.
What does this *E* mean? Is it a short expression merely for an actual
sum of elemental agents having a common resultant? And, if so, of what
kind are these agents? Or what may *E* mean, if it can be shown *not* to
be a short sign for a mere sum?
*No Explanation Offered by “Means” or “Formative Stimuli”*
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account